SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
DEVAN M.DESAI
Krishnan Satishbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Vasantlal Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Y N Ravani

JUDGMENT :

DEVAN M. DESAI, J.

1. By way of present Appeal, the present appellants have challenged the order dated 12.9.2025 passed by the learned Judge of City Civil & Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Civil Misc. Application (DC) No.155 of 2024 below Exh.23, by which, the application of present appellants to restore Civil Suit No.908 of 2021 was rejected under Order 9 – Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (For short, hereinafter referred to as 'the CPC ’).

2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Y. N. Ravani for the appellants. Perused the record.

3. The brief facts of the case are as under:

4. A civil suit was filed by the present respondent - original plaintiff for the recovery of possession of the suit property, which is situated at District Sub District Ahmedabad – 4 (Paldi) being T.P. Scheme No.26, Final Plot No.147 of village Vasna, Taluka Sabarmati. An ex-parte judgment and decree came to be passed by the learned trial Court on 1.2.2024 in favour of the respondent – plaintiff. The original defendant- mother of present petitioner expired after the judgment and decree on 24.2.2024. An application under Order 9 – Rule 13 of the CPC for setting aside the judgment and decree came to be file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top