2011 Supreme(Gau) 674
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (AGARTALA BENCH)
Utpalendu Bikas Saha, J.
Sri Dwijadas Chakraborty S/o Sri Dwijendra Chakraborty - Appellants
Vs.
The State of Tripura represented by the Secretary to the Home Department Government of Tripura, The Director General of Police Home Department Government of Tripura, The Deputy Secretary Home Department Government of Tripura and The Commandant 8th Battalion Tripura State Rifles (IR-III) - Respondent
WP (C) 97 of 2011
Decided On: 10.08.2011
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Somik Deb, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: D.P. Kundu, Adv. General, A.S. Lodh, Addl. GA and R. Guha, Adv.
Headnote:
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 162 and 309 - Tripura State Rifles (Discipline, Control, Service Conditions etc.) Rules, 1986 - Rule 27 - TSR Act, 1983 - Section 22 - Karnataka Civil Services Revised pay Rules, 1987 - Rule 313(b) - Police Act, 1861 - Quashing the letter - Enhancement of the age of superannuation - Pension on reemployment - Grant extension - Writ petition is filed by Petitioner who joined in the post of Naik Operator in Tripura State Rifles after completion of his service in the Indian Army for a period of 17 years 33 days on aid of offer of letter granting reemployment in favour of Petitioner for quashing letter issued by Deputy Secretary to government of Tripura to Director General of Police stating inter alia, that the notification regarding enhancement of the age of superannuation of the TSR personnel shall come into force and the benefit be extended – Held, By time it is settled that extension in service is not a right but within discretion of employer - Court also get support from the decision of Apex Court in All India Judges Association of India and Ors. AIR 1993 SC 2493 wherein the Apex Court observed extension of service after superannuation cannot be claimed as a matter of right - Competent authority is always at liberty to consider the merit of each case whether to grant extension or not - Case competent authority exercising its discretionary power repealed the prayer of the Petitioner – Court while exercising such discretionary power authority did not commit any wrong - Cases where the services of the person is extended on strength of service rules covering field and not in case where service was extended by way of exercising discretionary power of the employer and subsequently the age of superannuation as prescribed in the rule is extended by way of amendment of rules - Writ petition is dismissed
U.B. Saha, J.
1. The instant writ petition is filed by the Petitioner who joined in the post of Naik Operator in Tripura State Rifles after completion of his service in the Indian Army for a period of 17 years 33 days on the aid of offer of letter granting reemployment in favour of the Petitioner dated 23.08.2001 (Annexure-P5 to the writ petition) for quashing the letter dated 27.11.2010 (Annexure-P7 to the writ petition) issued by the Deputy Secretary to the government of Tripura (Respondent No. 3 herein) to the Director General of Police (Respondent No. 2 herein) stating inter alia, that the notification regarding enhancement of the age of superannuation of the TSR personnel shall come into force from 20.10.2010 and the benefit be extended only to those TSR personnel who are on regular service on the date of effect of the said notification and the order dated 30.11.2010 issued by the Commandant (Respondent No. 4 herein) (Annexure-P9 to the writ petition) wherein the Petitioner was released from service after completion of his extension in service as granted to him for the period of three months and also struck off his name from the strength of 8th Bn TSR where he had joined as Naik.
2. Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned Counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. DP Kundu, learned Advocate General assisted by Ms. AS Lodh, learned Addl. GA and Ms. R Guha, learned state counsel for the State Respondents.
3. Pleaded case needed to be discussed for disposal of the instant writ petition is as follows:
Admittedly, the Petitioner was appointed in the post of Naik Operator in the Tripura State Rifles after rendering service in the Indian Army on 23.04.2001 and thereafter he continued in service till his date of superannuation as prescribed in the provisions of Rule 27 of the Tripura State Rifles (Discipline, Control, Service Conditions etc.) Rules, 1986 (for short, 'Rules') i.e. up to 04.08.2010 till the completion of 50 years. Before attaining the age of superannuation, the Petitioner on 02.03.2010 made an application (Annexure-P4 to the writ petition) to the DIGP, AP (ADM & TRG) for extension of one year reemployment of service to become eligible for pension on reemployment in TSR.
4. Upon receipt of the aforesaid representation dated 02.03.2010, Respondent No. 2, Director General of Police, extended his service beyond the age of superannuation in TSR for three months i.e. from 01.09.2010 to 30.11.2010. Before completion of three months service of the Petitioner on extension beyond the age of superannuation the State Respondents in exercise of its rule making power under Section 22 of the TSR Act, 1983 (for short, 'Act, 1983'). The State Respondents amended the provisions of Rule 27 of the Rules by way of substituting the word 52' in place of 50' years as age of superannuation.
5. As in the said notification, from which date the amendment would come in to force was not mentioned, Respondent No. 3, Deputy Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Tripura vide letter dated 27.11.2010 informed Respondent No. 2, Director General of Police, that the said notification regarding enhancement of age of superannuation would come into force on and from 20th October, 2010 and the benefit of the same would be extended to those TSR personnel who are on regular service on the date of effect of the said notification.
6. Petitioner vide representation dated 12.11.2010 (Annexure-P8 to the writ petition) requested the Respondent No. 2 for extending his service w.e.f. 01.12.2010 to 31.05.2011 so that he can get the pensionary benefits. On 30.11.2010 his prayer for further extension was rejected and he was released from government service w.e.f. 30.11.2011 by way of striking off his name from the strength of 8th Bn TSR.
Hence, the writ petition.
7. The State Respondents by way of filing counter affidavit stated inter alia, that admittedly when the Petitioner was on re-employment the superannuation age of Naik in TSR was enhanced by two years then the prescribed age of