I.A.ANSARI, P.K.MUSAHARY
S. Sumnyan – Appellant
Versus
Limi Niri – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. Whether conditions of recruitment can be relaxed? If so, when and to what extent? Whether appointment of a person to a post without following any selection process whatsoever can be sustained if his appointment is challenged on the ground that though no selection process was followed, while making the appointment, the appointee was, otherwise, eligible to receive such appointment ? Whether the Constitutional scheme of public employment can sustain in making of appointment of a person, who may be eligible for a post, but has not come to be appointed by adhering to any selection process whatsoever? Whether an appointee, whose appointment has been made in conformity with the scheme of a given recruitment rules, can be treated as senior, in service, to an appointee, who had the requisite qualification, but whose appointment was without following any selection process?
These are some of the questions, which have arisen for consideration, in this appeal, which has been preferred against the judgment and order, dated 29.04.2005, passed, in WP (C) No. 746 (AP)/2001, whereby a learned Single Judge of this Court has allowed the writ petition of the Respondent No. 1 h
J.C. Yadav v. State of Haryana (1990) 2 SCC 189
Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission v. Dr. Narinder Mohan (1994) 2 SCC 630
M.A. Hague (Dr.) v. Union of India (1993) 2 SCC 213
M.K. Shammugam and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. (2000) 4 SCC 476
R.N. Nanjundappa v. T. Thimmaih (1972) 1 SCC 409:AIR 1972 SC 1767
State of Orissa v. Sukanti Mahapatra (1993) 2 SCC 486
State of U.P. v. Raffiquddin AIR 1988 SC 162
State of West Bengal v. Agshore Nath Dey (1993) 3 SCC 371
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.