SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 504

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
C.R. Sarma, J.
Rajib Neog - Appellants
Vs.
State of Assam - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 237 of 2003
Decided On: 29.07.2010

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: B.C. Das, D. Mazumdar and S. Saikia, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: K. Munir, Adv.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 498A and 306 – Offence of Abetment of suicide - Harrasment – Appeal against conviction - A highly qualified woman was married by almost equally qualified Appellant in month and after their marriage they used to live together - Marriage was solemnized against will of father of bride and as such he did not attend said marriage of his daughter - After marriage, Appellant supported deceased in doing her MBA course and she after completing MBA, joined service in Coca Cola Company - As alleged, Appellant and his mother used to torture deceased both physically and mentally and desired to divorce her to facilitate his second marriage - Appellant had picked up a quarrel in the breakfast table and gave a slap to deceased - Another day due to her late arrival from office Appellant made her to wait outside wall for about one and a half hours without opening the door of house – Company in which deceased worked selected her for attending a conference of company and accordingly she was required to go - In spite of making all arrangements for proceedings Appellant at last moment, i.e. two days before said occurrence restrained her from going – Held, No evidence has been adduced to show that nature and gravity of assault was such that same was unbearable for which she had no other alternative but to commit suicide - There is no evidence on record to show as to how and in which manner or in which parts of body and how frequently deceased was assaulted by Appellants - There is also nothing on record to show that she had sustained any injury on her person - That apart at no point of time deceased was required to take any medical help for such ill treatment/assault if any - Hence, it cannot be sufficient to safely conclude that alleged conduct of Appellant falls within definition of Section 498A IPC and 306 IPC - In view of absence of any substantive evidence it cannot be held that conduct of Appellants was of such a nature which compelled deceased to commit suicide - It is found that prosecution failed to substantiate by adducing cogent and reliable evidence that Appellant had treated deceased with such cruelty as defined by Section 498A IPC - That apart there is nothing on record to show that Appellants had abated deceased in any manner to commit suicide - Entire evidence on record and facts and circumstances lead to the irresistible conclusion that prosecution failed to prove offences - Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT

C.R. Sarma, J.

1. The judgment and order, dated 20.05.2003, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Guwahati, in Sessions case No. 203(K)/2000 is in challenge in this appeal. By the impugned judgment and order aforesaid the learned Sessions Judge convicted Sri Rajib Neog (hereinafter called the Appellant) for the offences under Section 498A and 306 of Indian Penal Code (in short IPC).

2. The Appellant was sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 (three) years and pay fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine suffer rigorous imprisonment for further period of 6 (six) months for his conviction under Section 498A and 306 of IPC.

3. Being aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence the Appellant has carried the appeal to this Court.

4. I have heard Mr. B.C. Das learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P., Assam.

5. The prosecution case, in brief, as revealed at the trial, may be stated as follows: Smt Sucharita Lahiri (hereinafter called the deceased), a highly qualified woman from Imphal (Manipur), was married by almost equally qualified Appellant in the month of July, 1997 and after their marriage they used to live together at Guwahati. The marriage was solemnized against the will of the father of the bride and as such he did not attend the said marriage of his daughter. After the marriage, the Appellant supported the deceased in doing her MBA course and she, after completing MBA, joined service in the Coca Cola Company at Guwahati. As alleged, the Appellant and his mother used to torture the deceased, both physically and mentally, and desired to divorce her to facilitate his second marriage. According to the prosecution, the Appellant/husband used to ill treat the deceased by compelling her to do household works against her will and restrained her from visiting her relatives and using the telephone.

Once, in presence of the younger sister of the deceased, the Appellant had picked up a quarrel in the breakfast table and gave a slap to the deceased. Another day, due to her late arrival from office, the Appellant made her to wait outside the wall for about one and a half hours without opening the door of the house. The company, in which the deceased worked, selected her for attending a conference of the company at Kolkata and accordingly she was required to go to Kolkata on 27.02.2000. In spite of making all arrangements for proceedings to Kolkata, the Appellant, at the last moment, i.e. two days before the said occurrence restrained her from going to Kolkata. As the Appellant had refused to allow the deceased to going to Kolkata, she, on the previous day of the occurrence, called her brother i.e. P.W. 9, who visited her and assured that he would make arrangement to drop her at the airport. But on the next morning i.e. on 27.02.2000, the P.W. 9 received an information from his sister that the deceased was hospitalized in the Down Town hospital for sustaining bum injuries. From the record it is revealed that, on 27.02.2000, at about 8:00 AM, the deceased committed suicide by setting her ablaze in the bathroom, as a result of which she sustained 95% bum injury, for which she was shifted to hospital for treatment wherein she succumbed to her said injury at about 4.00 PM on 28.02.2000.

6. Sri Somnath Lahiri (P.W. 9), who is the younger brother of the deceased, on 28.02.2000 lodged an FIR. (Ext. 8) with the O/C of the Women Police Station, Panbazar, Guwahati.

7. Upon receipt of the said FIR, police registered a case under Section 498A IPC and launched investigation into the matter.

8. During the investigation, the investigating officer prepared inquest report,-got the autopsy done, recorded the dying declaration of the deceased and the statement of the witnesses. The Investigating Officer collected and seized one plastic gallon (5 ltrs capacity) containing kerosene oil, one half burnt printed screen, one blue 95% brunt snippet, 31 Nos. of burnt match sticks, one matc
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top