IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (SHILLONG BENCH)
Tinlianthang Vaiphei and Ketulhou Meruno, JJ.
H. Kala Singh and Anr. - Appellants
Vs.
State of Meghalaya - Respondent
Decided On : 08.08.2008
NDPS Act - Criminal Appeal - Section 20(b)(ii)(C) - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act for possessing and transporting a large quantity of contraband ganja in a truck. The police personnel conducted vehicle checking and found the contraband ganja in the truck, leading to the appellants' apprehension and subsequent trial.
Finding of the Court:
The trial court found the appellants guilty based on the evidence of police witnesses and the substantial quantity of contraband ganja seized from the truck. The court rejected the appellants' claim of chance recovery and non-compliance with certain provisions of the NDPS Act. The court also held that the appellants were not entitled to the benefit of doubt and convicted them under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the recovery of the contraband ganja was not a chance encounter and that the police had not violated the provisions of the NDPS Act. The court also found the evidence of the police witnesses to be credible and reliable, leading to the conviction of the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to serve out the remaining period of their sentence and pay the fine.
T. Vaiphei, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2), 1973 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 36B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act" for short) is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.5.2007 passed by the Ld. Special Judge (NDPS), Shillong, in Cr. (NDPS) Case No, 2 of 2006 convicting the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term often years with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- to be paid by each of them, and, an default thereof, to undergo another two years of rigorous imprisonment.
2. The case of the prosecution, briefly stated, is that on 7.2.2006 at about 8 P.M., the Superintendent of Police, East Khasi Hills District (Mr. A.R. Mawthoh), received a reliable information to the effect that some antisocial elements had crossed over from Bangladesh for going to Assam via Shillong and accordingly directed the Dy. S.P. Reorganization (Mr. Lethindra Sangma), to proceed to Umtyngar for frisking and checking vehicles. He was also instructed to take with him Sub-Inspector Y. Chhetri, the Officer-in-Charge of Ri-Bong Beat House. The said police personnel then proceeded to Umtyngar around 9 P.M. and reached the destination after about 45 minutes. On reaching their destination, the police personnel started checking the vehicles which were plying on the road throughout the night. In the morning of 8.2.2006 around 5.30 A.M., when the police personnel checked one truck coming from Dawki Road towards. Shillong, a huge quantity of contraband ganja was found inside the truck whereupon the driver and handyman of the truck, namely, Mr. H. Kala Singh, the appellant No. 1, and Mr. Mohan Singh, the appellant No. 2, respectively, were apprehended. The police also seized the truck bearing Regd. No. AS-01/3698 and the contraband ganja at the spot and brought them to Laban Police Station. The seizure was made by the said S.I. Y. Chhetri on the authorization of the Dy. S. P., Reorganisation. The S.I. concerned then lodged a written ejahar to the Officer-in-Charge of Laban Police Station whereafter a regular case being F.I.R. No. 9(2) 2006 Laban P.S. under Section 20(b), NDPS Act was registered on 9.2.2006 against appellants.
3. On 10.2.2006, the appellants were produced before the Ld. Special Judege (NDPS), Shillong who remanded them to judicial custody. The case was endorsed to the S.I. concerned, who also seized the contraband ganja for investigation. During the course of investigation, the I.O. examined a number of witnesses under Section 161, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C" for short) and collected evidence. On completion of the investigation, the police, having found a prima facie case, submitted the charge sheet against the appellants under Section 20(b) NDPS Act to stand their trial. On 12.7.2006, the Ld. Special Judge (NDPS) also found a prima facie case to go to trial and accordingly framed the charge against the appellants under Section 20(b) NDPS Act, to which the appellants pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The trial court thereafter proceeded with the trial. In the courts of trial, the prosecution examined as many as six witnesses and exhibited thirteen documents and material exhibits including 140 master packets to establish the charge leveled against the appellants. At the conclusion of the trial, the trial court convicted the appellants under Section 20(b) NDPS Act and sentenced then to undergo imprisonment with fine in the manner indicated in the beginning. On the basis of the evidence of Shri Lethindra Sangma, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Reorganisation), Pw 3, Constable No. 365 Krishna Chhetri, Pw 5 and S.I. Yograj Chhetri, Pw 6, the trial court found that a vehicle checking had been conducted, on the instruction of the S.P., Khasi hills, at Umtyngar Bridge with effect from the night of 7.2.2006 for detecting anti-social elements moving from Bangladesh to Assam and
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.