AMITAVA ROY
Kishore Kalita – Appellant
Versus
Brahmaputra Board – Respondent
Amitava Roy, J.
1. The appointments of respondent No(s). 7 and 8 as Assistant Engineers with the Brahmaputra Board (hereafter referred to as the Board) are under challenge. The contention of the petitioner in essence is that he having fared much better than the said respondents in the written examination, their selection only on the basis of the relatively higher marks obtained by them in the interview is unsustainable in law.
2. I have heard Mr. P.G. Baruah, senior advocate for the petitioner, Mr. D. Choudhury, advocate for the respondent No. 7 and Mr. D Baruah, learned Standing Counsel for the Board.
3. First the pleaded facts. The petitioner, an Engineering Graduate in the Civil discipline, in response to the advertisement published by the Board on 10.9.2003 for filling up two posts of Assistant Engineer, offered his candidature. He thereafter pursuant to the letter dated 6.2.2004 appeared in the written test and obtained 97 per cent marks. According to him, the respondent Nos. 7 and 8 could secure marks in the range of 50 per cent in the said examination. Thereafter about 40 candidates were selected for the oral interview. The petitioner being called appeared in the viva v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.