SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 961

I.A.ANSARI
Indu Bhusan Dey – Appellant
Versus
Anita Paul – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. By this common judgment and order, I propose to dispose of all the five civil revision petitions, for, all of them involve identical facts and questions of law and, as has been sought for and agreed to by the learned Counsel for the parties, all the civil revisions have been heard together.

2. I have heard Mr. N. Choudhury, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. N. Dhar, learned Counsel for the opposite party.

3. Put in a narrow compass, the facts leading to the present set of revision petitions may, in brief, be set out as under:

(i) The opposite party herein were all teachers of South Point School, at Silchar, which the present petitioners represent. According to the school management, the appointment of these teachers was subject to a condition that they cannot admit their child in any English Medium School, in the city, unless such admission is refused by the South Point School. Contrary to this condition, which, according to the school management, all the teachers were bound to follow, the present set of teachers admitted their children in different English Medium Schools. Notices were accordingly issued, on 4.5.2005, by the management of the said






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top