I.A.ANSARI
Indu Bhusan Dey – Appellant
Versus
Anita Paul – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. By this common judgment and order, I propose to dispose of all the five civil revision petitions, for, all of them involve identical facts and questions of law and, as has been sought for and agreed to by the learned Counsel for the parties, all the civil revisions have been heard together.
2. I have heard Mr. N. Choudhury, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. N. Dhar, learned Counsel for the opposite party.
3. Put in a narrow compass, the facts leading to the present set of revision petitions may, in brief, be set out as under:
(i) The opposite party herein were all teachers of South Point School, at Silchar, which the present petitioners represent. According to the school management, the appointment of these teachers was subject to a condition that they cannot admit their child in any English Medium School, in the city, unless such admission is refused by the South Point School. Contrary to this condition, which, according to the school management, all the teachers were bound to follow, the present set of teachers admitted their children in different English Medium Schools. Notices were accordingly issued, on 4.5.2005, by the management of the said
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.