IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
P.P. Naolekar, Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, JJ.
Dr. M. Laitphlang and Ors. – Appellants
Vs.
State of Meghalaya and Ors. – Respondent
Writ Appeal Nos. 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 of 2003
Decided On: 28.01.2004
Promotion - Meghalaya Health Service - 1982 Rules, 1990 Rules - Rule 22 - The court directed the State-respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for promotion to Grade-I with effect from the dates, when they became eligible for promotion under the 1990 Rules, and to consider the writ petitioners for further promotion to Senior Grade with effect from the dates, when they became eligible for such promotion too. The entire exercise shall be commenced and completed within a period of four months from today.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitioners, Post Graduates in different specialized fields of medical sciences, were denied promotion to Grade-I under the 1982 Rules and 1990 Rules. They approached the Court alleging complete denial of their promotion as discriminatory and challenging the validity and constitutionality of the 1990 Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the writ petitioners had become eligible for promotion under the 1982 Rules and the 1990 Rules, and were unjustly denied promotion. The court directed the State-respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for promotion to Grade-I and Senior Grade with effect from the dates when they became eligible for such promotion.
Issues: The issues involved the denial of promotion to the writ petitioners, the validity and constitutionality of the 1990 Rules, and the delay in approaching the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the writ petitioners were entitled to be considered for promotion when they became eligible under the 1990 Rules, and the discrimination against them should be removed. The court refrained from granting retrospective promotion under the 1982 Rules due to the delay in approaching the Court.
Final Decision: The court directed the State-respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for promotion to Grade-I and Senior Grade with effect from the dates when they became eligible for such promotion, and to complete the exercise within four months.
P.P. Naolekar, J.
1. A batch of four writ petitions, namely, WP(C) No. 274(SH)/2001, WP(C) No. 275(SH)/2001, WP(C) No. 276(SH)/2001 and WP(C) No. 277(SH)/2001, involving similar questions of facts and law, were heard together by the learned Single Judge and decided by common judgment and order, dated 2.1.2003. Aggrieved by the directions contained therein, the private respondents in the said writ petitions have preferred the present five writ appeals, namely, Writ Appeal No. 29/2003, 30/2003, 31/2003, 32/2003 and 33/2003.
2. The facts, which are material for the purpose of disposal of the writ appeals, are not in controversy. What emerges as the admitted case of the parties may, in brief, be set out as follows :
(i) All the writ petitioners in these appeals are Post Graduates in different specialized fields of medical sciences. Following selection by the Meghalaya Public Service Commission, the writ petitioners joined, on different dates, the Meghalaya Health Service as specialists in the pay scale of Rs.1000-55-330-EB-70-1750. The writ petitioners in WP(C) No. 274 (SH)/2001, WP(C) No. 276 (SH)/2001 and WP(C) No. 275 (SH)/2001 have joined the said service on 14.7.1981, 24.1.1980 and 28.9.1981 respectively and though the petitioner in WP(C) No. 277 (SH)/2001 had initially joined, on 5.2.1979, as Assistant Surgeon in the pay scale of Rs.700-40-900-EB-40-1100-EB-45-1550 he too, upon selection, joined the said services, on 24.1.1980, as Medical Specialist in the scale of Rs.1000-1750. All the private respondents in the writ petitions aforementioned are appellants herein except Meghalaya Health Service Association, which is an association of all the members of the Meghalaya Health Service (hereinafter shall be referred to as "the said Association"). All the private respondents except the said Association were appointed on various dates in Meghalaya Health Service in the pay scale of Rs. 700-40-900-EB-40-1100-EB-45-1550. At the time, when the parties aforementioned had joined the said service, there was no definite set of recruitment rules. It was only on 16.8.1982 that the Meghalaya Health Services Rules, 1982 (hereinafter shall be referred to as the "1982 Rules") came into force and the said service received definite recruitment rules which prescribed, inter alia, conditions of recruitment and conditions of service of the members of the said service. The 1982 Rules prescribed four grades for the members of the said service, these grades being Senior Grade, Grade-I, Grade-II and Grade-III and laid down different pay scales for each of the said four grades. Since, at the time when the 1982 Rules came into force, the writ petitioners were working in the pay scale of Rs.1000-1750, they were placed in Grade-II inasmuch as the said scale of pay was prescribed pay scale for the members of the Grade-II. Similarly, the appellants herein except the said Association were placed in Grade-III inasmuch as their pay scale of Rs.700-1550 was the pay scale prescribed for the members of the Grade-III under the 1982 Rules, According to Sub-rule (2) of Rule 6 of 1982 Rules, a minimum period of 3 years of continuous service in Grade-III was required for the purpose of promotion to Grade-II from Grade-III and, similarly, for the purpose of promotion from Grade-II to Grade-I also, the minimum prescribed period was a period of 3 years of continuous service in Grade-II. Ignoring, however, the fact that the writ petitioners had become eligible for promotion on completion of three years of continuous service in Grade-II, the Government chose not to promote any of them to Grade-I, whereas the members of the said service, who were in Grade-III, continued to receive, from time to time, promotion to Grade-II from Grade-III. As promotions were not accorded to the members of Grade-II, they made several representations to the authorities concerned, but these representations yielded no results.
(ii) With effect from 5th December, 1990, the Meghalaya Health Serv
Dr. K. Ramulu v. Dr. S. Suryaprakash Rao
N.K. Durga Devi v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Government of Orissa v. Hanichal Roy
Ashok Kumar Uppal v. State of J and K
Suraj Prakash Gupta v. State of J and K
Y.V. Rangaiah v. J. Sreenivasa Rao
K.C. Arora v. State of Haryana
J.C. Yadav v. State of Haryana
State of Orissa v. Sukanti Mohapatra
Dr. M. A. Hague v. Union of India
M. Venkateswarlu v. Government of AP
Dr. Surinder Singh Jamwal v. State of J and K
Ajit Singh (II) v. State of Punjab
Ex. Capt. K.C. Arora and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
P. Mahendran and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission v. Dr. Narinder Mohan
Union of India v. N.R. Banerjee
Delhi Jal Board v. Mahinder Singh
Raghunath Prasad Singh v. Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.