SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Gau) 28

B.N.SARMA, K.LAHIRI
Phongseh Misao – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Land Acquisition – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.Nanda Kumar Singh

B. N. SARMA, J.:- This is an applica­tion under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash the Reference made by the Collector, Manipur North Dis­trict, Karong, to the District Judge, Manipur under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called the Act) in L. A. Case No. 1 of 1972 and for a writ of the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay to the petitioner the sum of Rs. 59,616/-awarded as compensation by the Collector in respect of the acquired land. The Collector of North District,1 Manipur, the State of Manipur and the Secretary, Government of Manipur, Development Department have been arrayed as defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 respec­tively. The relevant facts may be stated, in brief, as below.

2. The village Nungphou is a hill vil­lage within the North District, Manipur, and it is one of the villages grouped under the Sadar Circle No. 1 under the piovisions of the Manipur State Hill Peoples (Administra­tion) Regulation, 1947. The petitionei is the headman of this village and he has been in exclusive possession of the lands of the Tillage realising house tax from the residents of the village for the purpose of paying the same to the Go




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top