SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 326

JAMES, TAKRU
Gir Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri S.D. Pandey, For the Appellant / Sarvsri Gopal Behari, B.S. Darbari and G.A., For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Takru, J. - This appeal by the state of UP is directed against an order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chail, district Allahabad by which he dismissed a complaint filed by the Improvement Trust of Allahabad u/s 185 of the UP Municipalities Act read with S. 49 of the UP Town Improvement Act. The Improvement Trust through its administrator has also filed Revision application against the same order. As both appeal and the revision application are directed against the same order, I propose to dispose them of by a common judgment.

2. The facts leading up to the order under appeal are not in dispute and may be briefly summarised as follows.

3. The Respondent to this appeal is one Sri Gir Prasad Gupta, who also styles himself as Sri Gir Prasad Varshney. He took a plot of land-being Plot No. 552-in the Mumfordganj Housing Scheme, Allahabad, on lease from the Allahabad Improvement Trust hereinafter to be referred as the Trust on certain terms and conditions, and entered into possession thereof. It appears that sometime after coming into possession of the said plot he started constructions thereon but without giving notice to, and obtaining the sanction of, the Trust. On 20-11-1951

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top