T.NANDA KUMAR SINGH
Kakchingtabam Ibomcha Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Heirangkhongjam Noyon Singh and Ors. – Respondent
2. Heard Mr. N. Kerani, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Nandita, learned counsel for the appellant-plaintiff and Mr. Kh. Mani, learned counsel for the respondents-defendants.
3. The crucial issue to be decided in the present First Appeal is "whether the appellant-plaintiff is the adopted son of one Shri Brahmacharimayum Nilamani Sharma". For deciding this issue, the concise pleaded case of the parties are to be looked into, and accordingly, briefly noted.
The appellant-plaintiff filed O.S. No.6/2003 for the reliefs :
"(a) A decree for declaration of his title over the suit lands described in schedule A and B on the strength of the family arrangement.
(b) A decree for declaration that the plaintiff is the shebait of Radha Madhop Devata, which is worshipped inside the Suit Land-A.
(c) A decree for cancellation of the name of Radha Madhop Debata Shebait Committee, Keirak Awang Leikai, from the land record of the suit land.
(d) A decree for permanent injunction against
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.