The three civil revision petitions and one writ petition are based on a set of common basic facts and the reliefs claimed by the parties are also aimed at achieving the same object. Accordingly, all these four petitions have been heard together. They can be and are accordingly disposed of by a common judgment.

2. The three revision petitions have been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging various orders of the Executing Court in Title Execution No. 2/2014 of the Court of learned Additional District Judge at Dibrugarh. This title execution case was instituted by the decree holder (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DH’) of Title Suit No. 6/1983 of that court after the decree passed on 20.01.1995 by the trial court was upheld by the High Court and civil appeal preferred there-against by the judgment debtors (hereinafter referred to as ‘the JD’) before Supreme Court was dismissed.

3. Facts involved in the matter are stated in brief hereinafter. One Bhawani Shankar Bagaria, as plaintiff, had instituted aforesaid Title Suit No. 6/1983 in the court of learned Assistant District Judge at Dibrugarh stating that M/s Jokai (Assam) Tea Co. Ltd. had entered