SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 110

SUMAN SHYAM
Golap Lata Goswami – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Deka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B.K. Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.S. Sarma, Senior Advocate and Mr. A. Acharyya, Advocate.

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. B.K. Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/claimants. Also heard Mr. S.S. Sarma, learned senior counsel representing the respondent No. 3 Insurance Company as well as Mr. A. Acharyya, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5.

2. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 04/10/2007 passed by the Court of Learned Additional District & sessions Judge (1st Track Court) No. 2 cum Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kamrup at Guwahati in connection with MACT Case No. 230/2004, seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal on account of death of the husband of the appellant no.1 and father of the appellant no. 2, viz. Late Hemen Sarma.

3. The brief factual background of the case is that the husband of the appellant No. 1 late Hemen Sarma had met with an accident on 04/12/2003 in the National Highway No.31. While he was travelling in a Mahindra Pick-up Van No. AS 01/N-9997, at about 12-30 p.m., a bus coming from the opposite





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top