HRISHIKESH ROY, PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN
Chandan Kumar Neog – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, Represented by the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Assam – Respondent
Hrishikesh Roy, J.
Heard Mr. N. Dutta, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the WP(C) No.3190/2012, WP(C) No.5105/2012, WP(C) No.5825/2012, WP(C) No.394/2013, WP(C) No.780/2013 and WP(C) No.1734/2013. The learned Counsel Mr. B. Chakraborty argues for the petitioners in WP(C) No.2050/2014, WP(C) No.268/2015 and WP(C) No.269/2015. The learned Senior Counsel Mr. B. Banerjee represents the petitioners in WP(C) No.3784/2014. Mr. P. Mahanta, the learned advocate appears for the petitioners in the WP(C) No.6073/2013 and WP(C) No.6075/2013. The petitioners in the WP(C) No.780/2013 are the excess teachers of M.E. Schools and on their behalf Mr. S.S. Goswami makes submission. The L.P. School teachers have filed the WP(C) No.6861/2014 and other cases and the learned lawyer Ms. D. Borgohain makes elaborate arguments on their behalf by referring to various judicial pronouncements. The learned advocates Mr. M.U. Mandal, Mr. A.M. Borbhuiyan, Mr. K. Sarma, Mr. H. Ali and Mr. R.M. Choudhury and the learned lawyers in the other cases have adopted the same submission for th
Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United Labour Union reported in (1997)9 SCC 377
Ram Krishna Dalmia Vs. Shri Justice S.R. Tendolkar reported in AIR 1958 SC 538
Subramaniam Swamy Vs. CBI reported in (2014)8 SCC 682
Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Karnatala reported in (1990)2 SCC 562
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.