SUMAN SHYAM
Nabam Protima – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
Suman Shyam, J.
Heard Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 447 (AP) 2014 as well as Mr. L. Perme, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner in WP(C) No. 232(AP) 2014. Also heard Ms. G. Deka, learned Sr. Govt. Advocate. Arunachal Pradesh appearing for the State respondents in both the writ petitions.
2. Since the aforementioned writ petitions raises common question of law, hence, both the petitions are taken up for disposal by this common judgment and order.
3. In WP(C) No.447 (AP) 2014:- The petitioner's case, in brief, is that pursuant to the advertisement notice dated 07.08.2000 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent No.4 inviting candidature for tilling up a few vacant post of Group-“D” under the establishment of the respondent No.4, the petitioner besides other candidates had duly submitted their candidatures. Thereafter, by a call letter dated 25.08.2000, the petitioner was called for interview for the post of Group-1) and eventually, by the appointment order dated 14.09.2000 issued by the respondent No.4, the petitioner was appointed as a Forest Guard under the establishment of Deputy Chief Wild Life Warden
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax v. V. Subba Rao
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers’ Association v. State of Maharashtra
Dr. M.S. Mudhol v. S.D. Halegkar
J. Jayala-lithaa v. State of Karnataka
Ms. Power Control Appliances v. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd.
Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai v. R. Govindaswamy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.