SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 137

PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
NIBEDITA BARUAH D/O SHRI UPENDRA KR. BARUAH – Appellant
Versus
NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Sarma
For the Respondent: Ms. U. Choudhury

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Heard Mr. K Goswami, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No. 1 to 7 and Mr. K. Patgiri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondent No. 8.

2. In this writ petition, work order dated 15.06.2017 issued by the Numaligarh Refinery Limited (NRL), respondent No. 1 to the respondent No. 8 in terms of Tender No. OC27000019/PRA dated 20.04.2017 for hiring of an Ambulance with facilities of critical care is challenged as the respondent No. 8 is not technically qualified as per the terms and conditions of the tender document.

3. The Numaligarh Refinery Ltd., the respondent No. 1 on 20.04.2017 issued E-tender vide Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) under Tender No. OC27000019/PRA dated 20.04.2017 for ‘hiring of ambulance with facilities of critical care’. The entire tender process was to be carried out online. As per the NIT dated 20.04.2017, the tender process was to be carried out in two stages i.e. Technical Bid and Financial Bid. Clause A specifies the technic










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top