SUMAN SHYAM
Chatradhar Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam And Ors Rep By Commissioner And Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suman Shyam, J.
Heard Mr. Nilay Dutta, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N.N.B. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in WP(C) No.1984/2019, Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in WP(C) No.2955/2019 and Mr. R. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in WP(C) No.3819/2019. I have also heard Mr.D. Mazumdar, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam appearing for the official respondents and Mr. D. K. Mishra, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr.B. Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 in WP(C) No.2955/2019.
2. There are three petitioners in W.P.(c) No 1984/2019 who are engaged in the business of tailoring and supply of school uniforms through their individual SSI units based in the state of Assam. The two writ petitioners in W.P. (c) No 2955/2019 are proprietorship firms engaged in the business of manufacturing garments and supply of school uniforms. The petitioners have their respective manufacturing units situated in
Directorate of Education and others Vs. Educomp Datamatics Ltd. and others
Dr.Jagadish Saran and others Vs. Union of India
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and others
Olga Tellis and others Vs. Bombay Municipal Corpporation and others
Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India
U. P. State Electricity Board and Ors. Vs. Hari Shankar Jain and Ors
Union of India and Others vs S.B. Vora And others
Union of India and others Vs. Dinesh Engineering Corporation and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.