KALYAN RAI SURANA
Dipak Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Parke Davi India Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. P.K. Roy, the learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. D. Baruah, the learned advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. The appellant is the plaintiff in Title Suit No. 220/2001. The said suit was filed for realizing a sum of Rs. 63,56,750 as damages and compensation on the alleging that the appellant was illegally and mala fide terminated from service.
3. The brief background of the present litigation is as follows:
(b) Thereafter, vide letter dated 29.12.1997, the other staffs were c
S. Kesari Hanuman Goud v. Anjum Jehan
Pearlite Liners (P.) Ltd. v. Manorama Sirs
Lata Construction v. Dr. R. Rameshchandra Ramniklal Shah
Union of India v. Sugauli Sugar Works (P.) Ltd.
Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. Bharat Mining Corporation Ltd.
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College, Shamli v. Lakshmi Narain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.