SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 114

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Ranadhir Nath – Appellant
Versus
On Death Of Sonamoni Nath, Her Legal Heir Shephali Rani Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Roy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kalyan Rai Surana, J. - Heard Mr. P.K. Roy, learned counsel for the appellant, who has made his submissions for admission of the appeal under Order XLI, Rule 11 CPC.

2. By this appeal under section 100 CPC, the appellant has assailed the first appellate judgment and decree dated 10.09.2018, passed by the learned District Judge, Karimganj in Title Appeal No. 5/2012, by which the appeal was allowed by decreeing the suit and thereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.08.2004, passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.1, Karimganj (as it was then), in T.S. No. 103/1983. The appellant herein was arrayed as the defendant in the suit.

3. The predecessor- in- interest of the respondents had filed a suit for confirmation of possession upon partition of the 'saham' land on the basis of title acquired through land holding right. In the plaint, it was projected that vide registered sale deed dated 08.04.1981, the predecessor- in- interest of the respondents and the appellant had purchased the suit land from S.K. Hasoi @ Hasoi Ali, who was holding jote right and accordingly, he because owner of 50% (eight anna) of that land. It was further projected that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top