KALYAN RAI SURANA
Praveen Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Raushan Jabin Ansari – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Kalyan Rai Surana, J. - Heard Mr. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This revision under section 115 CPC is directed against the first appellate judgment and decree dated 29.05.2019, passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur in Title Appeal No. 9/2019, thereby dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree passed by the Court of learned Munsiff No.2, Sonitpur, Tezpur in T.S. No. 12/2012. The respondent is the landlady of the petitioner and she had instituted the suit for ejectment of the petitioner and for realization of arrear rent.
3. The case of the respondent- plaintiff in the suit was that the appellant was a monthly tenant under Tarek Akhtar Ansari, her brother, in respect of a room described in the schedule of the plaint from where he is carrying out business under the name and style of M/s. Super Tyres Services, for which the petitioner was required to pay monthly rent at the rate of Rs.1,400/- per month, payable on 7th day of each and every English calendar month. By virtue of family arrangement dated 14.07.2010, amongst the heirs of Late Ghulam Samdani Ansari, th
Bhojraj Kunwarji Oil Mills vs. Yograjsinha Shankersinha Parihar
Hazi Mahmed Jafor vs. Dr. Imran Hussain Choudhury
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. vs. Ajit Prasad Tarway
Kali Kumar Sen vs. Makhanlal Biswas
Nityananda Dutta vs. Anisul Haque
Ram Karanji More vs. Keshardev Jalan
Rameswar Choudhury vs. Ram Niranjan More
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.