SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 242

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Praveen Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Raushan Jabin Ansari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D. Choudhury, Advocate, Md I Hussain, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kalyan Rai Surana, J. - Heard Mr. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This revision under section 115 CPC is directed against the first appellate judgment and decree dated 29.05.2019, passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur in Title Appeal No. 9/2019, thereby dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree passed by the Court of learned Munsiff No.2, Sonitpur, Tezpur in T.S. No. 12/2012. The respondent is the landlady of the petitioner and she had instituted the suit for ejectment of the petitioner and for realization of arrear rent.

3. The case of the respondent- plaintiff in the suit was that the appellant was a monthly tenant under Tarek Akhtar Ansari, her brother, in respect of a room described in the schedule of the plaint from where he is carrying out business under the name and style of M/s. Super Tyres Services, for which the petitioner was required to pay monthly rent at the rate of Rs.1,400/- per month, payable on 7th day of each and every English calendar month. By virtue of family arrangement dated 14.07.2010, amongst the heirs of Late Ghulam Samdani Ansari, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top