SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 69

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNCHAL PRADESH) AIZAWL BENCH : AIZAWL
NELSON SAILO, J.
Sh. C. Lalengzauva – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
WP(C) No. 60, 62 of 2019
Decided on : 05-02-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli
For the Respondent: Mr. C. Zoramchhana, Mr. A.R. Malhotra, Mr. Lalbiakkima, Ms. Mary Lalawmpuii

Point of law: Rule 22(5)(a) provides that the reservation of post in the ratio of 80:20 between direct and diploma engineers will be discontinued after all the incumbents in the junior grade from the promotion quota as on the date of the commencement of the principle rules.

Headnote:

Retired from service - Promotion to a non-existent post – Claim of compensation - Whether the petitioner should be placed above the private respondents in inter se seniority list for having been placed in a Functional Post at an earlier point of time - brief facts of the case in that the petitioners, who are 28 in numbers are Graduate Engineers and they were directly appointed to the Mizoram Engineering Service - They are aggrieved with the fixation of separate seniority list for Graduate Engineers and Diploma Engineers in the Senior Grade of the MES under the PWD. According to them, reservation between Graduate and Non-Graduate Engineers is to be discontinued after all the present incumbent Non-Graduate Engineers in the Junior Grade as on the date of the commencement of the Mizoram Engineering Service Rules, 2013 get promote expired retired or have quitted service by any means –

Finding of the Court:

As already noticed herein above, Rule 22(5)(a) provides that reservation of post in between direct and diploma engineers will be discontinued after all incumbents in the junior grade from the promotion quota as on the date of the commencement of the principle rules either get promoted or died while in service or retired on superannuation pension or resigned from the service or removed/dismissed from service. The additional affidavit filed by the PWD as well as PHE Department clearly indicates that there as many Junior Grade MES Officers respectively but have not yet been promoted to the Senior Grade of the MES. As such, in view of Rule 22 a separate seniority list for Graduate and Diploma Engineers is only justified - As such, upon having regard to case in its entirety, I do not find the petitioners in to have any legitimate grievance and the writ petition being found without merit, the same is dismissed – Further admitted position is that the MES being an organized service, the Rules of 2013 and Rules of 2017 are common and equally applicable to four cadres of the service, which includes the PWD and PHE Department amongst others - Therefore, if a separate seniority list is maintained in respect of the Graduate and Diploma Engineers in the PWD, the same should also be adopted in the PHE Department particularly, when the quota or reservation of post for Graduate and Diploma Engineers in ratio as per Rules of 2017 is still being maintained. It is also noticed that the PHE Department as was maintaining a separate seniority list for Graduate and Diploma Engineers in the Senior Grade of the MES –

Result: Ordered accordingly

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No.60 of 2019 and Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 to 9. Also heard Mr. Joseph L. Renthlei, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No.62 of 2019 and Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 to 11. Mr. C. Zoramchhana, the learned Addl. Advocate General, Mizoram appears for the State respondents in both the writ petitions.

[2.] WP(C) No. 60 of 2019 pertains to Public Works Department (PWD for short) while WP(C) No. 62 of 2019 pertains to Public Health Engineering Department (PHE Department for short). Since the issue involved in both the cases are similar i.e., seniority between Diploma and Graduate Engineers, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

[3.] The brief facts of the case in WP(C) No. 60 of 2019 is that the petitioners, who are 28 in numbers are Graduate Engineers and they were directly appointed to the Mizoram Engineering Service (MES for short). They are aggrieved with the fixation of separate seniority list for Graduate Engineers and Diploma Engineers in the Senior Grade of the MES under the PWD. According to them, reservation between Graduate and Non-Graduate Engineers is to be discontinued after all the present incumbent Non-Graduate Engineers in the Junior Grade as on the date of the commencement of the Mizoram Engineering Service Rules, 2013 (Rules of 2013 for short) get promoted, expired, retired or have quitted the service by any means. They contend that all the Non-Graduate Engineers in the Junior Grade of the MES as on the date of the commencement of the Rules of 2013 except for one Mr. O. Hari Mohan Singha have either been promoted or have retired from service and therefore, fixation of separate seniority list between Graduate Engineers and Diploma Engineers is not justified.

[4.] The petitioners therefore contend that the instruction issued by the DP&AR(GSW) vide Communication dated 26.07.2018 (Annexure-15), which is in response to the representation made against the fixation of inter-se-seniority of Senior Grade of the MES (PW cadre) cannot be sustained and should be set aside. The learned Senior Counsel by referring to the Notification dated 10.08.2018 (Annexure-18) submits that it can be seen from the provisional inter-se-seniority list of Senior Grade of MES under PWD cadre (Civil) (Promotee) as on 06.08.2018, Sh. O. Hari Mohan Singha retired on superannuation pension on 31.08.2018 and therefore, there can no longer be any reservation between Graduate and Diploma Engineers and that there should be a common seniority list in the Senior Grade of the MES (PW cadre).

[5.] The petitioners further contend that under the PHE Department, placement to the Functional Post of the Senior Grade of the service is done on the basis of seniority as provided by the proviso to Rule 22(5)(b) of the Mizoram Engineering Service (Amendment) Rules, 2017 (Rules of 2017 for short). The said criteria having been followed in respect of the PHE Department, the same should be followed by the PWD as well.

[6.] Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the State respondents on the other hand submits that the reservation of posts for Graduate and Diploma Engineers has to be maintained inasmuch as, there still are Diploma Engineers in the Junior Grade who are not yet promoted to the Senior Grade till date. Therefore, in view of Rule 22(5)(a) of the Rules of 2017, fixation of separate seniority list for Graduate Engineers and Diploma Engineers is fully justified and as per the Rules.

[7.] Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent Nos. 5 to 9 in WP(C) No. 60 of 2019 adopts the argument of Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned Addl. Advocate General and he submits that since there are Jun

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top