SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 28

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
M/s Shiva Bottles Pvt Ltd And Anr - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 4 Ors - Respondents
WP(C) 199 of 2022
Decided on : 02-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Mr. R.M. Deka, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. P.N. Goswami, Adv.

Point of law : Interfering with the sealing/closing of the Petitioners’ factory premises would not effect or hamper the investigation so carried out.

Headnote:

Assam Excise Act, 2020 - Section 53(1)(a)(c)(d) & (e) and Section 54 - Assam Opium Prohibition Act, 1947 - Assam Ganja and Bhang Prohibition Act, 1959 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Drugs - Petitioners by way of the instant writ petition challenges action of respondent authorities of closure/sealing of bottle manufacturing factory of Petitioners and to pass consequential orders in respect thereto - Case of Petitioners is that Petitioner is a Private Limited Company and is engaged in business of manufacturing of bottles and caps and for that purpose have a factory - Products manufactured by Petitioner Company i.e. PET bottles, caps and aluminum caps are supplied to various Industries such as FMCG, Pharmaceutical and Liquor Manufacturers - It is an admitted fact that Petitioner is one of Directors of Petitioner Company and also an authorized signatory, which is a Liquor Manufacturing Company and son of Petitioner is licensee of the said Manufacturing Company - Whether the mandate of Section 41 has been complied or not of formation of the reasons to believe and recording grounds thereof has been complied or not is not indicated both in affidavit-in-opposition or in the Forwarding Report.

Finding of the Court:

Stand of the respondent authorities before this Court in their affidavit-in-opposition is required to be taken into consideration - Now the question further arises in view of stand of the respondent authorities that voluminous materials are lying in office premises of Petitioner Unit and same could not be seized entirely and taken out of the premises are contrary to Forwarding Report made by Inspector of Excise who categorically stated that “during search operation huge quantity of objectionable materials and IMFL of various brands and sizes were also recovered and seized - Seized liquor and other objectionable materials such as fake holograms, labels, bottle caps were then eventually entered in the Seizure Memo” - Further to that, Section 44 and 45 of the Act of 2000 clearly mandates manner in which the seized articles are to be dealt with and in view of mandate therein coupled with contents of the Forwarding Report, this Court is of the opinion that interfering with the sealing/closing of Petitioners’ factory premises would not affect or hamper the investigation so carried out.

Result: Writ petition allowed

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. R.M. Deka, learned counsel for the Petitioners. I have also heard Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Excise Department.

2. The Petitioners by way of the instant writ petition challenges the action of the respondent authorities of closure/sealing of the bottle manufacturing factory of the Petitioners and to pass consequential orders in respect thereto. The case of the Petitioners is that the Petitioner No.1 is a Private Limited Company and is engaged in the business of manufacturing of bottles and caps and for that purpose have a factory at Patarkuchi, Sonapur. The products manufactured by the Petitioner Company i.e. PET bottles, caps and aluminium caps are supplied to various Industries such as FMCG, Pharmaceutical and Liquor Manufacturers across all North Eastern States. It is an admitted fact that the Petitioner No.2 is one of the Directors of the Petitioner Company and also an authorized signatory of M/s Shiva Beverages Private Limited, which is a Liquor Manufacturing Company and the son of the Petitioner No.2 is the licencee of the said Manufacturing Company. The Petitioner Company in course of its business also provides bottles and caps to M/s Shiva Beverages Private Limited. It appears from the materials on record that M/s Shiva Bottles Private Limited has its factory at Patarkuchi, Sonapur whereas the factory premises of M/s Shiva Beverages Private Limited at Kendubam, Khetri, Kamrup (M) District.

3. On 09.12.2021 at about 10:20 p.m. the Inspector of Excise on the tip of secret information under the direct supervision of Superintendent Excise, Kamrup (M) conducted a sudden raid/search, at the factory premises of M/s Shiva Beverages Private Limited at Kendubam, Khetri and found two employees namely Dhiraj Deka and one Sanjib Das present at the licenced premises. During search operation, as per the Forwarding Report dated 10.12.2021 encloses as Annexure-C to the writ petition, various objectionable materials and liquor were found in the licenced premises which were not allowed under the Excise Act and Rules and the same were recovered and seized and in respect thereof a Seizure Memo was also made. A case was also registered being Case No. SNP/Ex.24/2021 under Section 53(1)(a)(c)(d) & (e) and Section 54 of the Assam Excise Act, 2020 (for short ‘the Act of 2020’). In the Forwarding Report it was further alleged that the arrested employee Dhiraj Deka in his statement stated that the illegal trade was being carried out by one Tushar Singla, who was the licencee of the licenced premises. The Seizure List which was marked as M.R. No.324/2021 was enclosed to the said Forwarding Report and a perusal of the said Seizure List would show the seized articles and quantity mentioned therein.

4. Almost simultaneously on 10.12.2021 at about 1:46 a.m. a sudden raid/search was conducted in the premises of “Shiva Group of Industries” and more particularly in the factory of the Petitioner Company located at Patarkuchi, Sonapur. In terms with the Forwarding Report dated 10.12.2021 enclosed as Annexure-A to the writ petition, it has been alleged that during the search operation huge quantity of objectionable materials and IMFL of various brands and sizes were also recovered and seized. The seized liquor and other objectionable materials such as fake holograms, labels, bottle caps were then eventually entered in the Seizure Memo. The person in-charge who was the custodian of the seized exhibits, one Nirsing Mushahary was arrested and as per the said Forwarding Report it has been alleged that the said Nirsing Mushahary had revealed that the main person behind the illegal trade is the Petitioner No.2, who happens to be owner of the property. The Seizure List which has been marked as M.R. No.325/2021 was enclosed to the Forwarding Report. At this stage, it would be relevant to take note of that in both the Forwarding Reports encloses as Annexure-A and Annexure-

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top