GAHOI GRAH UDDHYOG vs STATE OF M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(MP) 791

VISHAL MISHRA
GAHOI GRAH UDDHYOG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant : Harshad Bahirani
For Respondent: Jitesh Sharma

ORDER/JUDGMENT – Shri Harshad Bahirani, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Jitesh Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard.

The present petition is being filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :

“A. That the impugned action of the respondents whereby the petitioner premises has been locked may kindly be quashed and direction may kindly be issued to the respondent for unlocking the premises immediately. B. That further direction may kindly be given to the respondents that the FIR registered against the petitioner at Crime No. 99/2021 may kindly be quashed. C. That petitioner premises has been lock since long just because of arbitrary action of respondents so, from locking the premises and till unlocking the compensation rupees 25 lakhs rupees may kindly be awarded against the respondent authority. D. That other relief which is deems fit may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is running the floor mill in the name and style of Gahoi Grah Uddhyog in Transport Nagar, Gwalior and the petitioner has