IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Kannaki Brahma Basumatary W/o Sri Amitabh Basumatary – Petitioner
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 5693 of 2017
Decided On : 21-01-2022
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 226 – Rejection of candidature - Respondent authorities issued an advertisement by which applications were invited from eligible candidates fulfilling eligibility for award of RO dealership - In said advertisement which has been enclosed as Annexure to writ petition, there were various locations mentioned wherein respondent authorities would be appointing Regular and Rural retail outlet dealership in Assam - Instant writ petition, the details of which is stipulated of said advertisement and same for sake of convenience is quoted - Whether land of petitioner falls within Development Block directed Standing Counsel, Revenue, one to obtain instruction.
Finding of the Court:
Court is of opinion that such direction cannot be issued in as much as it is absolutely within policy and the discretion of authority concerned where to setup a retail or rural outlet as per advertisement - Though an allegation has been made to effect that rejection of the petitioner’s candidature is in order to favor some blue eyed boy of the respondent IOCL authority but said allegation is without any material particulars - It is also not the case of petitioner as could be seen from the writ petition that respondent authorities had accepted candidature of other candidates whose land does not fall within Gossaigaon Development Block - Consequently the writ petition is devoid of any merits.
Result: Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
1. Heard Mr. A. Lal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and A. Zahid, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the communication dated 24.8.2017, whereby the candidature of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the plot of land offered by her is outside the advertised area i.e. the offered plot of land does not fall under the advertised block Gossaigaon.
3. The brief facts of the instant case is that the concerned respondent authorities issued an advertisement dated 24.10.2014 by which applications were invited from eligible candidates fulfilling eligibility for award of RO dealership. In the said advertisement which has been enclosed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition, there were various locations mentioned wherein the respondent authorities would be appointing Regular and Rural (Kissan Seva Kendra) retail outlet dealership in Assam. The instant writ petition pertains to a location at Bhowraguri, the details of which is stipulated at S. No. 72 of the said advertisement and the same for the sake of convenience is quoted herein-below:
Indian Oil Corporation Limited proposes to appoint Regular Retail Outlet dealers (KISSAN SEVA KENDRA) I Assam as per following details.
| S. No. | Name of Location | Block | Revenue District | Type of No. RO | Estimated Monthly Sales potential | Category | Type of site | Minimum Dimension of the site (in metres) | Finance to be arranged by the applicant (Rs. in lakhs) | Mode of selection | Fixed fees minimum bidding Amount (Rs. in lakhs) | Security Deposit In lakhs | ||
| Regular/ Rural | MS HSD in KLS | SC/SC-CC-1/SC/-CC-2/ST/ST/CC-1 | CC/DC/CL/CFS | Frontae | Depth | For eligibility | Estimated Fund Required for development of infrastructure | Draw of lots/bidding | ||||||
|
| ST-CC-2/OBC/OBC/CC-1/OBC-CC-2/OBCOPEN-CC- 1/OPEN –CC-2 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
xxx xxx xxx
| 72 | Bhowraguri | Gossaigaon | Kokrajhar | Rural | 48 | ST | CFS | 25 | N/A | Lots | N/A | 0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. From the said advertisement in so far as the instant writ petition is concerned the location was Bhowraguri under block Gossaigaon, Revenue District Kokrajhar. As the petitioner is the owner and occupier of a plot of land admeasuring 1 bigha under Khatian No. 22 covered by Patta No. 48(old) and 90 (new), Dag No. 33 (old) and 54 (new) of Salitoli Class of village Garjan Part-II, under Bhowraguri Police Outpost within Gossaigaon Revenue Circle the petitioner applied for the said dealership. Thereupon after submission of her bid, as contended by the petitioner, the Land Evaluation Committee visited the site offered by the petitioner for Retail Outlet dealership at Bhowraguri and confirmed the eligibility and suitability of the location of the plot of land. The petitioner also following the advice of the committee procured a certificate dated 30.7.2016 from the Office of the Assistant Settlement Officer, Gossaigaon which as per the petitioner would reveal that the land offered by the petitioner is located at Bhowraguri under Gossaigaon Revenue Circle and the said certificate was also submitted by the petitioner to the respondent No. 4 vide a communication dated 1.8.2016. Thereafter, as the petitioner contends that to the utter surprise a communication dated 24.8.2017 was received by the petitioner wherein it was mentioned that the petitioner’s bid has not been found to be eligible for the Retail Outlet dealership as the plot of land offered by the petitioner is outside the advertised area i.e. the offered land does not fall under the advertised Block Gossaigaon. In the said communication, it was also mentioned that if the petitioner was aggrieved against the rejection of her ca
Rejection of candidature - Direction cannot be issued in as much as it is absolutely within the policy and the discretion of the authority concerned where to setup a retail or rural outlet as per the....
The court affirmed that authorities maintain discretion in selecting dealership locations, and candidacies outside advertised criteria are invalid.
Respondents cannot impose unadvertised conditions post-application, as the applicant's land met the described criteria, thereby affirming the legitimate expectation of the applicant.
The court confirmed that a specific location's advertisement does not necessitate the land being in a specified village, protecting the applicant's legitimate expectation for dealership consideration....
The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for a retail outlet dealership due to failure to meet land suitability criteria as per the Brochure guidelines.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with the terms and conditions of the brochure and the need for approval before concluding a violation.
LPG distributorship – An order of cancellation of candidature of an applicant, which is subject matter of challenge in a court of law, has to be defended with reference to Advertisement and pleadings....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.