IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Tarun Chandra Das S/o Late Mohendra Ch. Das – Petitioner
Versus
Bhanjana Kalita D/o Harish Kalita – Respondent
Crl. Pet. No. 589 of 2021
Decided On : 22-02-2022
Constitution of India,1950 - Article -15(3) and 39 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 125 and 482 – Maintenance Claim - Granting maintenance to wife - Quantum of maintenance granted – Challenged - Before marriage, petitioner told respondent that he has already divorced his first wife and shown her some fake documents - Then being left with no option, respondent tried to adjust herself with petitioner and started leading a conjugal life - Petitioner started picking up quarrel with respondent without any rhyme or reason and started torturing her both physically and mentally and also demanded money on advice of other persons.
Finding of the Court:
Quantum of maintenance - Admittedly, petitioner is serving in Agriculture Department - His monthly salary is about Rs. 40000/, factum of which is not seriously disputed by producing any documents like salary certificate etc - respondent is a house wife having no source of income of her own - Though learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that she has been serving in a school, yet no evidence to that effect is lead by him before the learned court below - Object of this section is not to punish for past, but to prevent vulnerable section of society, who are unable to maintain themselves, so that they are left beggared and destitute on scrap heap of society, and thereby driven to a life of vagrancy, immorality and crime for their sustenance, by compelling those who are capable to support to perform their moral obligation - Court find that conclusion so arrived at by learned courts below are not suffering from any illegality or impropriety requiring this court to interfere with same in exercising its inherent jurisdiction.
Result: Petition and accordingly same stands dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Correctness or otherwise of the judgment and order dated 06.09.2021, passed in Criminal Revision No. 17/2019, by the learned Additional District Judge, Bilasipara by which the learned Additional District Judge, Bilasipara has affirmed the judgment and order dated 04.10.2019 passed in Misc. Case No. 244/2017 by the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M), Bilasipara under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 granting maintenance to the respondent, namely Smt. Bhanjana Kalita, is put to challenge in this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. by the petitioner, namely, Shri Tarun Chandra Das.
2. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order dated 04.10.2019 in Misc. Case No. 244/2017, the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M), Bilasipara has directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) per month to the respondent under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.
3. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:
Badshah vs. Urmila Badshah Godse and Another
Chanmunia vs. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha and Another
State of Maharashtra vs. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand
Savitaben Somanhai Bhatiya vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Once such presumption of a lawful marriage commenced to operate in favour of a marriage which has taken place in fact, such a presumption alone would be good enough to entitle the wife to maintain.
`(1) Only a legally wedded wife can claim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.(2) Decree of divorce can only be granted by Court and divorce by agreement is not valid in eyes of law.
The Court clarified that a second wife whose marriage is void due to the survival of the first marriage is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The Court emphasized the need for stri....
Term ‘wife’ in Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, includes a woman who has been divorced by a husband or who has obtained a divorce from her husband and has not remarried.
Point of Law : As it is a settled position of law that there is no strict prove of marriage is required in a proceeding under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.
Point of Law : The principles of Hindu Personal Law have developed in an evolutionary way out of concern for all those subject to it so as to make fair provision against destitution. The manifest pur....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.