KALYAN RAI SURANA
SWAPAN KUMAR SINGHA S/O- LT JAGAT MOHAN SINGHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
By virtue of order dated 11.11.2020, passed in W.P.(C) 4603/2020, these two writ petitions have been tagged together. Hence, both the writ petitions have been heard analogously. It is mentioned that the petitioner in W.P.(C) 4603/2020 has been arrayed as respondent no. 6 in W.P.(C) 3214/2019. It may be also be mentioned that for the sake of clarity, in this order, the parties are referred to as per their position in W.P.(C) 3214/2019.
2. Heard Mr. I.H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P. (C) 3214/2019, Mrs. N. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) 4603/2020. Also heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned standing counsel for the Secondary Education Department and Mr. N.H. Borbhuiya, learned standing counsel for the National Council for Teacher Education. There was no representation from the respondent no. 7 and 8 in W.P.(C) 3214/2019 on call.
Prayers made in W.P.(C) 3214/2019:
3. By filing the said W.P.(C) 3214/2019 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for (i) holding the B.Ed. Degrees of the respondent nos. 6, 7 and 8 be declared to be invalid as they do not have the approval/ recognition from the National Council fo
Commissioner of Police, Bombay v. Govardhandas Bhanji
Praga Tools Corporation v. Shri C.V. Imanual & Ors.
Punjab Financial Corporation v. Garg Steel
Union of India & Ors. v. Arulmozhi Iniarasu & Ors.
Khela Banerjee & Anr. v. City Montessori School & Ors.
General Officer Commanding v. CBI & Anr.
Brijendra Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
National Council for Teacher Education & Anr. v. Venus Public Education Society & Ors.
B. Premanand & Ors. v. Mohan Koikal & Ors.
State of U.P. & Ors. v. Bhupendra Nath Tripathi & Ors. (2010) 13 SCC 203
State of Orissa & Ors. v. Prasana Kumar Sahoo
D. Navtnchandra and Company, Bombay v. Union of India
Undavilli Nagarathnam v. Reddi Satyanarayana Murthi
Mukta Ram Deka & Ors. v. State of Assam & Ors.
University of Mysore v. C. D. Govinda Rao & Anr
M.P. Oil Extraction and Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. (1997) 7 SCC 592
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 14 of the NCTE Act and the validity of B.Ed. degrees obtained from an institute prior to its recognition by the NC....
The institution offering the course is entitled to award the degree until the end of the academic session, and the recognition granted by the NCTE would relate back to the date of the institution's a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a B.Ed. degree obtained from an institution, even if unrecognized, would be valid if the course was undertaken in the given year when the reco....
Section 17 of the NCTE Act empowers the Regional Committee of the NCTE to withdraw recognition granted to an institution offering course or training in teacher education, for reasons to be recorded i....
Recognition to Teachers Training Colleges – There can be no rational for NCTE or its Regional Committee to deny recognition from Academic Year 2021-2022 and insist on recognition for Academic Session....
NCTE has the final authority over recognition applications regardless of state restrictions, which limits the state's role to recommending actions without binding NCTE's decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.