Back
R.F.NARIMAN, B.R.GAVAI
DEVENDRA PATHAK SARVODAYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, J.
1. The facts in all these bunch of petitions are almost similar and as such, are decided by this common judgment.
2. We will refer to the facts in the lead matter i.e. Writ Petition (Civil) No.518 of 2021 in some detail and would refer to the bare necessary facts in all other matters.
Writ Petition (Civil) No.518 of 2021
3. The petitioner college was established as unaided training college to impart Bachelor in Teacher Education (B.Ed.) and Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) courses in the year 2011.
4. The petitioner college submitted an application to respondent No.1 – National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as ‘NCTE’) for grant of recognition under Section 14(1) of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) for conducting B.Ed. course with an annual intake of 100 students.
5. Vide order dated 25.2.2014, NCTE granted recognition for B.Ed. course under one year programme for Academic Year 2014-2015 with an annual intake of 100 students.
6. Respondent No. 2 – Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar, vide letter dated 2.8.2014 granted affiliation to the petitioner college to conduct
Recognition to Teachers Training Colleges – There can be no rational for NCTE or its Regional Committee to deny recognition from Academic Year 2021-2022 and insist on recognition for Academic Session....
The need for commensurate faculty strength as per the NCTE Act and the requirement for proper authorization for admitting students.
The statutory provisions under Section 17 of the NCTE Act only allow for continued education of currently enrolled students post-recognition withdrawal, effectively barring new admissions for de-reco....
Section 17 of the NCTE Act empowers the Regional Committee of the NCTE to withdraw recognition granted to an institution offering course or training in teacher education, for reasons to be recorded i....
Point of Law : Petitioner is not entitled for an order for directing the respondent authorities to select and appoint the petitioner as the Principal of the said school.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
