MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HABIB ALI BARBHUIYA S/O- LT. IMRAN ALI BARBHUIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
Heard Dr. B. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1, 3, 6, 7, 8 & 9 and Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the respondent no.5. Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel appears for the respondent nos.2 and 4.
2. The petitioner’s case is that he was temporarily appointed as a Patowari in the office of the respondent no.9 on 10.03.1966. The petitioner was thereafter sent for training for the Recorders’ Class Certificate Course in 1982 and after completion of the course, he was given a Certificate dated 09.06.1983. However, the petitioner’s service as an untrained temporary Patowari was terminated by discharging him from service w.e.f 01.07.1982, vide order dated 23.06.1982. The petitioner thereafter did not work for 5 (five) years. The petitioner was subsequently temporarily re-appointed into service, vide order dated 11.08.1987 w.e.f. the date of joining.
3. The petitioner thereafter retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 29.06.2002. As no pension and other pensionary benefits was being given to the petitioner, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition 13 years later, praying
State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer)
Prem Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others reported in 2019 (10) SCC 516
Dolly Borpujari Vs. State of Assam & Others reported in 2010 (2) GauLT 147
Kabiram Rajbangshi Vs. State of Assam & Others reported in 1997 (1) GauLT 589
State of Kerala vs. M. K. Kunhikannan Nambiar Manjeri Manikoth, Naduvil (Dead) and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.