SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR, J.
Rajni Kant Arun S/o Late Krishna Kant Prasad - Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13646 of 2023
Decided On : 20-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Manisha Singh, Supragya
For the Respondent: Abhishek Singh

Continuous service and regularization can establish entitlement to pension, overriding initial non-permanent employment status.

Headnote:(A) BIHAR PENSION RULES, 1950 - Rule 58 and 61 - Claim for pension - Petitioner had continuous service of 30 years, regularized in 2017, but respondent denied pension citing lack of substantive post. Court ruled the continuous service establishes eligibility despite initial ad hoc status. (Paras 4, 18, 20, 23)

(B) Employment Law - Nature of Employment - Continuous service of temporary employees may be deemed permanent under certain criteria. Denial of claims without consideration of extended duration and contribution to pension schemes is arbitrary. (Paras 17, 19)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, serving since 1992, superannuated in 2022 but denied pension based on non-fulfillment of criteria in Rules 1950. Employment was initially ad hoc but led to regularization. (Paras 3-6)

Findings of Court:
Continuous service and contributions reflect substantive employment nature; hence, petitioner entitled to benefits. Respondent's denial overturned. (Paras 20, 23)

Issues: Whether continuous service can establish eligibility for pension despite initial ad hoc status and whether the respondents acted arbitrarily in denying rights. (Paras 4, 15)

Ratio Decidendi: Continuous employment and subsequent regularization create a right to pension, overriding initial non-permanent status; procedural requirements must not undermine substantive rights accrued through service. (Paras 17, 18, 20)

Result: Writ petition allowed, impugned order set aside; respondents directed to grant pension. (Paras 23, 24)

Table of Content
1. comparative analysis of employment law precedents. (Para 1 , 9 , 12 , 16)
2. eligibility for pension based on continuous service and regularization. (Para 2 , 3 , 10 , 20)
3. interpretation of substantive post requirements in pension law. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 18)
4. impact of pay revisions on employment status. (Para 6 , 14 , 21)
5. final ruling in favor of pension entitlement. (Para 23 , 25)

JUDGMENT :

HARISH KUMAR, J.

1. This Court has heard Ms. Supragya, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Abhishek Singh, learned Advocate for the State.

2. The petitioner, who superannuated on 31.12.2022, as a Member of Mode Mandali from the Department of Information and Public Relation, Government of Bihar has approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents concerned to count his services from the date of his joining, i.e., 26.05.1992, till the date of his superannuation on 31.12.2022, for the purposes of payment of pension and other terminal benefits, such as gratuity, leave encashment, provident fund etc. The petitioner is also aggrieved with the letter dated 18.07.2023, the copy of which is marked as Annexure-4 to the writ petition, whereby the concerned respondent has held the petitioner not entitle for pension, in view of Rule 58 and 61 of the BIHAR PENSION RULES , 1950 (hereinafter referred to as, “Rules, 1950”).

3. The necessary facts as culled out from the materials available on record, in brief, are as follows:

(i) The petitioner was duly appointed as a member of Mode Mandali Yatra Party (Entertainment Group) on ad hoc basis for six months vide office order issued by the Director, Information and Public Relation Department under Memo No. 919 dated 23.05.1992 in the pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800/-.

(ii) In pursuant to the order aforenoted, the petitioner submitted his joining. The services of the petitioner was extended till further order vide office order contained in Memo No. 196 dated 27.01.1993.

(iii) The petitioner was accorded all the service benefits, including the benefit of Provident Fund and group insurance scheme from the date of joining. The petitioner was also allowed the replaced revised pay scale of Rs. 4500-7000/- with effect from 01.04.1997 and further the benefit of 6th Pay Revision in the pay band of PB-1 (5200-20200) with grade pay of Rs. 2800/- with effect from 01.04.2007. Subsequently, the benefit of 7th Pay Revision in the pay scale of Level-5 with the basic pay of Rs. 57500/- was also extended, until his superannuation.

(iv) The services of the petitioner along with other similarly situated persons were duly regularized and taken in the cadre of Bihar Information and Public Relation Department vide office order no. 77 dated 10.03.2017, with effect from the date on which the Bihar Information and Public Relation Department Artists Cadre (Recruitment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2017 was notified.

(v) The petitioner having attained his age of superannuation, retired from the aforesaid post on 31.12.2022. The petitioner on being superannuated submitted his application in prescribed format, requesting for payment of pension, which has turned down by the concerned respondents with a clear stipulation that the petitioner does not fulfill the conditions laid down in Rule 58 and 61 of the Rules, 1950 vide order contained in Letter dated 18.07.2023, which is put to challenge before this Court.

4. Ms. Supragya, learned Advocate for the petitioner assailing the impugned order and the action of the respondents, primarily has taken this Court through the Rule 58 of the Rules, 1950. It is contended that the petitioner’s request for pension could have only been considered on fulfillment of three conditions that the service must be under the Government, on substantive and permanent post, and paid by the Government. The impugned order admitted the position that the petitioner was working in Bihar Information and Public Relation Department and thus, inevitably working under the Government; and secondly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top