SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 685

Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Hill Trade Agencies – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. U. Chakraborty
For the Respondent: Mr. K.P. Maheswari and Ms. M. Sharma

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Ms. U. Chakraborty, the learned senior counsel appearing for the Railways-appellant. Also heard Ms. M. Sharma, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. This is a common Judgment for these two cases.

2. The appeals are filed under section 23 of the Railways Act, 1987, against the judgment dated 20.4.2015, passed by the Railways Claims Tribunal at Guwahati in Claim Application No. OA III/GHY/2005/0618(New), (Old No. OA 618/2005) and the judgment dated 20.4.2015 passed by the Railways Claims Tribunal at Guwahati in Claim Application No. OA.III/GHY/2005/0629(New), (Old No. OA 0629/05).’

3. The short question that arises in these two appeals is as to whether section 74 of the Railways Act of 1989 debars the consignor to claim excess freight charge, which was paid at the time of booking.

4. This court in MFA No. 7/2005 has held as under:

    “The question of payment of freight charges arises at the stage of initial booking of the consignment by the Railway Wagons and, therefore, it is threshold transaction. At that stage the property does not pass on to the consignee or the endorsee under section 74 of the Act. It is only when the goods are booked and Railway Receipt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top