JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.C. Sarma, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. G. Bharadwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in CRP(I/O) No. 3/2021. The said counsels also appear for the respondent in CRP(I/O) No. 6/2021 and CRP(I/O) No. 69/2021. I have also heard Mr. N.N. Karmakar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner in CRP(I/O) No. 6/2021 and CRP(I/O) No. 69/2021, who also appears on behalf of the respondent in CRP(VO) No. 3/2021.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in the instant proceedings are referred to in the same status as they stood in the suit.

3. All the three revision applications are taken up together for final disposal as the they relate to the same subject-matter.

4. The brief fact of the instant cases is that the father of the plaintiff-decree-holder instituted a suit in the court of learned Assistant District Judge, Guwahati, which was registered and numbered as TS No. 35/1991 with the prayers which, for the sake of convenience, are quoted herein-below:

“(a) A decree of declaration that the plaintiff has