IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram And Arunachal Pradesh)
R.M. Chhaya, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Apurba CH. Barman S/o. Sri Amulya CH. Barman – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam and 4 Ors. – Respondents
W.A. No. 211 Of 2022
Decided On : 06-09-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 16 - Assam Fishery Rules - Rule 12 – Appeal – Equality before Law - Appellant/original petitioner that respondent No.3 herein floated a Tender Notice vide Tender No. 1/2015 inviting tenders from interested persons from Scheduled Caste listed communities of respective areas in State of Assam in respect of different fisheries throughout State including Dohor-Jogra Fishery in Dhubri District for a period of seven years. It is case of appellant that he did apply pursuant to said Tender Notice and offered a sum of Rs. 4,50,001/- per year and was second highest bidder - It is no doubt true that in agreement it is mentioned that it is for seven years, fact remains that amount determined, which was paid by appellant, was for six years (Para 10).
Findings of Court: Affidavit-in-opposition filed by authorities clearly spell out that proceedings of impugned Tender Notice has culminated into settlement in favour of one Madhab Barman and settlement order has been issued, which has been done by respondents as per Tender Notice. It is not case of appellant that he participated in tender process pursuant to impugned Tender Notice. Hence, grounds raised by learned counsel for appellant lack merit. Observations made by learned Single Judge are based on correct interpretation of Rule 12 of Assam Fishery Rules.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
R.M. Chhaya, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 28.03.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 2262/2022, the appellant/original petitioner has preferred this appeal.
2. The following facts emerge from the record of the appeal: It is the case of the appellant/original petitioner that the respondent No.3 herein floated a Tender Notice vide Tender No. 1/2015 inviting tenders from interested persons from the Scheduled Caste listed communities of the respective areas in the State of Assam in respect of different fisheries throughout the State including Dohor-Jogra Fishery in Dhubri District for a period of seven years. It is the case of the appellant that he did apply pursuant to the said Tender Notice and offered a sum of Rs. 4,50,001/-per year and was the second highest bidder. As the record unfolds, one Amar Barman was the highest bidder, who had offered Rs. 9,00,101/-for one year. It appears from the record that the successful bidder could not act as per the accepted bid and did not deposit the requisite amount. It further appears that on coming to know about the same, the appellant/original petitioner wrote a letter/petition on 21.02.2016 expressing his willingness to take the lease, which culminated into an agreement dated 03.05.2016. By the said agreement, the appellant/original petitioner agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 4,50,001/-for Dohor-Jogra Fishery. It was clearly mentioned by the appellant/original petitioner in his letter dated 21.02.2016 that the settlement of the fishery may be given to him by cancelling the existing settlement. As per the agreement so made, the appellant/original petitioner deposited an amount of Rs. 27,00,006/-. The record further indicates that on completing six years of the lease, the appellant/original petitioner did apply for extension. However, the same was not considered by the respondent authorities and meanwhile, the respondent authorities issued a Tender Notice on 14.03.2022 being Tender Notice No. AFDC.992/2021/3870-3884 for settlement of Dohar-Jogra Fishery in Dhubri District. The said Tender Notice was challenged by the appellant on the ground that it was prima facie illegal. It was the case of the appellant that in the State of Assam fisheries are given on lease for a minimum period of seven years and, therefore, the appellant cannot be discriminated as he has regularly paid all the instalments.
3. Relying upon Covenant No. 36 (a) of the terms and conditions of the agreement executed on 03.05.2016, it is contended by the appellant that the extension be granted in his favour and on such other grounds it was also contended that the impugned Tender Notice if allowed to be carried out, would be violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. On such factual background and the grounds raised in the petition, the appellant inter alia prayed for the following reliefs in the writ petition :
AND
In the interim Your Lordships may further be pleased to pass an interim order by staying further proceeding of the impugned illegal Tender Notice No. 01/2
Respondent authority has no power to make any direct settlement in terms of Rule 12 of Assam Fishery Rules.
Rule 3 of Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 has laid down procedure for Sale of Fisheries.
The rejection of a bid must be reasonable and in compliance with previous court orders, and settlement of public resources must consider the public revenue and statutory provisions for rate enhanceme....
It is settled position of law that power of judicial review of administrative action is intended to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality or unreasonableness or bias or mala fide.
Tender disqualification must adhere strictly to statutory rules, excluding arbitrary criteria. A co-operative society's corporate identity shields it from the personal liabilities of its members. Add....
Arbitrariness in government contract decisions, Need for transparency and official reports in lease extensions
Point of Law : Decision of the administrative authority vested with the discretionary power under a statute must have to be within the four corners of the law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the settlement process for a fishery must adhere to the requirements specified in the relevant rules and tender notice. The court emphasized t....
Point of Law : Settlement process initiated for the settlement of Fishery for a period of 7 [seven] years is required to be brought to a logical conclusion at the earliest for the interest of all con....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.