SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 595

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram And Arunachal Pradesh)
Manish Choudhury, J.
Ranjit Ch. Deka S/o. LT. Kanak Ch. Deka and Anr. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam And 4 Ors – Respondents
W.P.(C.) No.903 Of 2016
Decided On : 16-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.K. Das.
For the Respondents: Mr. P.N. Goswami.

Point of Law: It is a settled position of law that a candidate, who consciously takes part in selection process, cannot turn around and question very selection process. When two petitioners were disqualified at stage of physical fitness test, they are precluded from challenging selection process held after stage they were declared disqualified.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Post of Excise Constable - Selection process for filling – Power of High Court to issue writs - Writ petition has been preferred by two petitioners seeking inter alia cancellation of entire process of selection that was undertaken pursuant to an Advertisement for filling up of 54 [fifty-four] nos. vacancies in of post of Excise Constable in Department of Excise, Government of Assam, and also for a direction to respondent authorities in Excise Department, Government of Assam to hold a fresh selection process for filling up of those 54 [fiftyfour] nos. of vacancies in post of Excise Constable - It is not disputed by petitioners that all candidates were made aware of procedure of selection by specifically mentioning in Advertisement that a male candidate if he failed to run 1,500 metres within time limit of 5 [five] minutes, would be declared disqualified and would not be permitted to take further part in selection process. (Para 11).

Findings of the Court: Writ petition is also found to be not maintainable on ground of non-impleadment of successful candidates. The present writ petition has been preferred assailing entire selection process conducted pursuant to Advertisement. The selection process was completed with notification by declaring results by notifying Roll nos. of candidates who were found successful in selection process for the 54 [fifty-four] nos. of posts of Excise Constable so advertised. Though writ petition was preferred, that is, before declaration of results by notification, two petitioners during period subsequent, that is, a period of about more than six years have not taken any steps to implead any of those candidates selected for 54 [fifty-four] nos. of posts of Excise Constable, more particularly, seven nos. of selected candidates against whom they have brought allegations in this writ petition. In event present writ petition is to be allowed persons likely to be affected are 54 [fifty-four] nos. of selected candidates. It is settled that a Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India ought not to hear and dispose of a writ petition without persons who would be vitally effected by judgment before it as respondents or at-least some of them being before it as respondents in a representative capacity if their number is too large to join them as respondents individually and if petitioners refuse to so join them, the High Court ought to dismiss petition for non-joinder of necessary parties.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. By invoking the extra-ordinary and discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the instant writ petition has been preferred by two petitioners seeking inter alia cancellation of the entire process of selection that was undertaken pursuant to an Advertisement dated 28.11.2014 for filling up of 54 [fifty-four] nos. vacancies in the of post of Excise Constable in the Department of Excise, Government of Assam, and also for a direction to the respondent authorities in the Excise Department, Government of Assam to hold a fresh selection process for filling up of those 54 [fifty-four] nos. of vacancies in the post of Excise Constable.

2. An Advertisement was published by the respondent no. 2 i.e. the Commissioner of Excise, Assam on 28.11.2014 for filling up of 54 [fifty-four] nos. of vacancies in the post of Excise Constable under the establishment of the respondent no. 2. The Advertisement mentioned that the post of Excise Constable would carry a Pay Scale of Rs. 5,200/--Rs. 20,200/-[PB-2] with Grade Pay of Rs. 2,000/-. The educational qualifications prescribed in the Advertisement for the post of Excise Constable was minimum High School Leaving Certificate Examination [HSLC] or its equivalent from any recognized University/Board. The Advertisement had further laid down the procedure of selection for the post of Excise Constable. As per the Advertisement, there would a physical test followed by the viva-voce. In the physical test, the male candidates would be required to run 1,500 metres in 5 [five] minutes and the female candidates would have to complete the running of 800 metres in 4 [four] minutes. There would be no written test for the candidates aspiring for the post of Excise Constable. The successful candidates in the physical test would be called for the viva-voce. The Advertisement also prescribed about the physical attributes to be possessed by the male candidates and the female candidates for the post of Excise Constable.

3. In response to the Advertisement dated 28.11.2014, both the petitioners submitted their candidatures. While the petitioner no. 1 had applied for the post of Excise Constable from Kamrup District the petitioner no. 2 had applied for the post of Excise Constable from Barpeta District. Call letters dated 22.04.2015 and 20.03.2015 were issued to the petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 respectively to appear in the physical fitness test/running test. In the call letter issued to the petitioner no. 1, he was assigned Roll no. 2-GU-3758 and he was asked to appear in the physical fitness test to be held at Sarusajai Stadium on 24.05.2015. In the call letter issued to the petitioner no. 2, he was assigned Roll no. 1-BG-08720 and he was asked to appear in the physical fitness test to be held at Birjhora Higher Secondary School on 05.05.2015.

4. It was the case of the petitioners that on receipt of the call letters, the two petitioners appeared at the respective notified venues before the respondent authorities on the dates scheduled for the physical fitness tests in terms of the call letters and completed 1,500 metres of running within the stipulated time limits. The petitioners had asserted that after the running, they were physically checked along with other candidates and both of them were found fit without any deficiency and as such, they became eligible to appear in the viva-voce test. The petitioners were surprised when the respondent authorities published a list containing the Roll nos. of the candidates who were called for the viva-voce test to be held from 17.08.2015 on wards. The Roll nos. of the two petitioners did not figure in the list. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner no. 2 had approached this Court by a writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 4657/2015. There was another writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 4069/2015 of similar nature, preferred by three other candidates who appeared in the physical fitness test held for the recruitment of Excise Constable pursuant to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top