Back
David Lallianthanga – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nelson Sailo, J.
1. This is an appeal from jail directed against the Judgment and Order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Aizawl in SR No. 22 of 2014 A/o Crl. Trl. No. 2134 of 2013 u/s. 376 (2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) convicting the appellant under the aforesaid section of law. On being convicted as such, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for one (1) month.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 02.12.2013, a written FIR was submitted by Lalmalsawmi (PW-1) of Zuangtui to the effect that on 01.12.2013, the appellant committed an offence of penetrative sexual assault upon her daughter who was a minor and 12 years of age. As a result, Bawngkawn P.S Case No. 224/2013 dated 02.12.2013 under Section 376 (2)(i) IPC r/w Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 was registered and the case investigated into by the investigating officer (Case 10). During the course of investigation, the case I.O. examined the complainant as well as the victim, and records their statements. The victim was also forwarded to the Civil Hospital
Insufficient evidence for conviction under IPC Section 376(1) necessitates conviction for attempted rape under Section 376/511 due to partial penetration.
Partial penetration is sufficient for a conviction of attempted rape, reaffirming the necessity of proven intent to commit the offence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in testimonies alongside lack of medical corroboration can lead to acquittal.
Penetration, even partial, constitutes rape under IPC and POCSO Act; the credibility of child witnesses must be carefully assessed.
The requirement of proving penetration for conviction under Section 3 of the POCSO Act and the interpretation of the legal provisions related to sexual assault.
For a conviction under Section 3 of the POCSO Act (penetrative sexual assault), there must be clear evidence of penetration of the male organ into the victim's body; in the absence of such evidence, ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle that corroboration is not required for the testimony of the victim in case of rape if the evidence is of sterling quality. The judgme....
The conviction for rape was upheld based on the prosecutrix's credible testimony, while the conviction under the SC/ST Act was quashed due to lack of evidence regarding the accused's knowledge of the....
A victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases if it is credible, even if medical evidence is inconclusive.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
