Back
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Samsul Hoque And Ors. S/o Late Abdul Jubbar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Shri PD Nair, learned counsel for the review applicants. Also heard Shri R. Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department wheras Shri J. Handique, learned counsel has appeared for the State respondents.
2. By this application, a review has been sought for in respect of an order dated 21.05.2018 passed by the Single Bench of this Court in WP(C)/3518/2017. By the aforesaid order, the writ petition was dismissed holding the same to be without any merits.
3. Before going to the facts or the grounds of review, this Court is reminded of the limited role of a Review Court.
4. By taking the spirit of the Section 114 read with Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the grounds of review is limited to the following:
ii. Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record;
iii. Any other sufficient reason.
5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a catena of decisions has laid down that a Review Court is not a Court of Appeal where any error can be corrected. It is only those errors which are palpable and appa
Review Petition – Jurisdiction of High Court while exercising review cannot be exercised as an inherit power nor as Appellate Court be exercised in guise of power of review – Power of review may be e....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the review jurisdiction is limited and can only be allowed on grounds of mistake or error apparent on the face of the record. The court emphas....
The issuance of rent receipts does not confer legal title to land, and compensation directives cannot stand in the absence of established title under land acquisition laws.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
