ROBIN PHUKAN
Lalit Kumar Singh, S/o Lt. Arjun Singh Damai – Appellant
Versus
Arunachal Pradesh Rural Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
In this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Shri Lalit Kumar Singh has put to challenge the enquiry report, dated 01.05.2018, submitted by the Enquiry Officer, (holding that out of 6(six) charges, 4(four) have been proved, one not proved and one partly proved), and the order of punishment, dated 02.06.2018, passed by the disciplinary authority inflicting major punishment of removal of the petitioner from service, with immediate effect and also imposing fine upon him.
2. The factual background leading to filing of the present writ petition is adumbrated herein below:-
Amar Nath Chowdhury Vs. Braithwaite And Company Ltd. & Ors (2002) 2 SCC 290
Captain M. Paul Anthony vs. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. & Anr. reported in (1999) 3 SCC 679
Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. vs. Mohd. Yusuf Miya & Ors.
Deokinandan Sharma vs. Union of India and Ors.
Financial Commissioner (Taxation) Punjab & Ors. Vs. Harbhajan Singh 1996(9) SCC 281
Prem Nath Bali vs. Registrar, High Court of Delhi & Anr
State of Rajasthan vs. B. K. Meena & Ors.(1996) 6 SCC 417;
State Bank Of India Vs. Neelam Nag: (2016) 9 SCC 491
State of Rajasthan Vs. B.K. Meena : (1996) 6 SCC 417
State Bank of India and Anr. vs. Bela Bagchi and Ors.: (2005) 7 SCC 435;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.