JUDGMENT :

1. In this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Shri Raja Palong, has put to challenge the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 15.01.2018, issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, constituting a District Level Kebang; the decision of District Level Kebang, dated 19.01.2018; and the impugned orders dated 22.05.2018 & 10.07.2018, reminding the mother of the petitioner to repay the debt amount; the order dated 23.10.2018, directing the mother of the petitioner to handover her Motung Patang (WRC Field) and Rs. 10,80,000/-(Rupees ten lakhs eighty thousand) only to private respondent No. 3; the summons dated 03.11.2021 & 22.11.2021, issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, and the order dated 14.03.2022; the order dated 14.03.2022, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, directing the petitioner to handover the Motung Patang (WRC Field) to private respondent No. 3; and the proceeding and decision arising out of impugned order dated 15.01.2018, issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District.

2. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:-

“The father of the petitioner and the private respondent No. 3 entered into a Sale Agreement of timber, dated 07.08.2005, and the respondent No. 3, was allowed to cut timber from the land. After the death of the father of the petitioner, his mother reentered into an Agreement, dated 14.08.2014, with the private respondent No 3. Thereafter, one Marge Rolley, private respondent No. 4, has started stealing timbers from the land and, thereafter, the private respondent No. 3 has filed a complaint alleging that the mother of the petitioner is selling timbers to the respondent No. 4. Upon the said complaint, a Kebang proceeding was initiated and in the said Kebang, late mother of the petitioner submitted that she had not allowed the private respondent No. 4 to fell trees and to collect timbers from the land. Thereafter, the Kebang found that the late mother of the petitioner is innocent and the private respondent No. 4 is responsible for all the ruckus and, thereafter, the Kebang, on 29.04.2016, took a decision and imposed fine of Rs. 5,00,000/-(Rupees five lakhs) only upon the private respondent No. 4, which was to be paid to private respondent No. 3 and in failing to which, the respondent No. 4 has to surrender his JCB No. AR-01A-5669 3D. Thereafter, the private respondent No. 3, filed an application for execution of the Kebang decision, dated 29.04.2016, before the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District. But the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, instead of initiating execution proceeding, has constituted a District Level Kebang, vide impugned order dated 05.01.2018, which, in fact, is a coram non judice. Subsequently, the District Level Kebang decision, vide order dated 29.01.2018, found the mother of the petitioner guilty and convicted her. Thereafter, the respondent No. 3 again filed one Execution Application before the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, and vide impugned Execution Order, dated 23.10.2018, the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, directed late mother of the petitioner to handover Motung Patang (WRC Field) and Rs. 10,80,000/-(Rupees ten lakhs eighty thousand) only to private respondent No. 3, in spite of the fact that the Deputy Commissioner has no jurisdiction to take up the matter in view of the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 2021, which was communicated to him on 19.08.2021. But, the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, ignored the said communication and issued summon to the petitioner vide orders dated 03.11.2021 & 22.11.2021 and finally, vide order dated 14.03.2022, the Deputy Commissioner, Siang District, directed the petitioner to handover Motung Patang (WRC Field) to the private respondent No. 3 and further directed to stop cultivation over WRC Field at Kaying with immediate effect. Being highly aggrieved, the petition