Back
ROBIN PHUKAN
Neyang Yebu, W/o. Late Mijang Yebupangkam – Appellant
Versus
Alo Yebu Pangkam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In this Civil Revision Petition, under section 50 of the Assam Frontier (Administration of Justice) Regulation 1945, (AFR-1945), the petitioner-Shri Tumsen Basar has put to challenge the order, dated 21.03.2018, passed by the learned Addl. Commissioner, Yingkiong, Upper Siang Distric, in Keba Appeal No. 01/2015.
2. It is to be noted here that vide impugned order, dated 21.03.2018, the learned Addl. Commissioner, Yingkiong had affirm the Keba decision, dated 17.06.2014 and 01.05.2015, by which the Keba had decided that ‘Tako’ paddy field shall be in the permanent possession of Shri Alo Pangkam, the respondent herein.
3. The factual background, being projected by the learned counsel for the parties, which leads to filing of the present petition, is briefly stated as under:-
Payment of compensation in lieu of land - Inadequacy of cost - Petitioner No. 3 and his mother had put their signature in Annexure II, i.e. the deed of final settlement. Now, the petitioner cannot ra....
Non-consideration of significant grounds in a civil revision petition can constitute an error apparent on the face of the record, warranting a review of the earlier order.
The High Court in its revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the CPC cannot interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the Court below unless there is any perversity or non-application of ....
Not affording an opportunity to rebut claims of parties by allowing them to lead evidence either oral or documentary shall negate very foundation requirements of not only provisions but also lead to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
