IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, ITANAGAR BENCH
Robin Phukan, J.
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
Papy Blayu Tayum W/o Lt. Karling Dodum and Anr. – Respondents
MACApp. 3 of 2021
Decided On : 15-07-2022
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 – Motor Accident Claim – Claim petition till realization – Claiming Compensation – Driver of offending vehicle – Driving license – Favour of claimant – Factual background leading to filing of present appeal is briefly – Held, However, quantum of compensation, which, claimant is entitled to, is modified to extent as indicated above – Appellant is directed to pay a sumto claimant within from today, adjusting amount, if any, paid earlier – Learned Tribunal has directed to pay interest @ 9%, from date of filing claim petition till realization of amount – In view of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation Tragedy Victims Association and Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(S.C.), I find no ground to interfere with same – Appellant shall deposit remaining amount of award before learned Tribunal within a period – Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. B. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant and also heard Mr. L. Perme, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This MAC Appeal, No. 03 (AP) 2021, is directed against the impugned judgment and award, dated 19.02.2021, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (for short, ‘MACT’), West Kameng District, Bomdila, Arunachal Pradesh in M.A.C. Case/No.7/17. It is also to be noted here that vide the impugned judgment and award, dated 19.02.2021, the learned Member, MACT, Bomdila has directed to pay a sum of Rs.17,95,000/-along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount to the respondent No.1 Smti. Papy Blayu Dodum @ Tayum.
3. The factual background leading to filing of the present appeal is briefly, stated as under:-
4. Mr. B. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the impugned judgment and award suffers from manifest illegality on two counts. Firstly, Mr. Ghosh submits that the impugned judgment was passed by the learned Member, MACT, Bomdila without considering the fact that the driver and owner of the vehicle had violated the condition of permit which was granted for carrying 9 (nine) passengers as mentioned in the registration certificate of the offending vehicle, bearing Registration No.AR-05-2843, which is annexed with the appeal as Annexure-2. Secondly, Mr. Ghosh, submits that the driver of the offending vehicle possessed driving license of Light Motor Vehicle (Non-Transport category), but, the learned Member, MACT have not considered the said category of driving license of the driver which is enclosed with the petition as Annexure-3, while awarding compensation. Mr. Ghosh, further, submits that terms and condition of insurance policy is violated and as such, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Member, MACT, West Kameng District, Bomdila, Arunachal Pradesh is liable to be set aside. It is the further submission of Mr. Ghosh that the learned Member, MACT has fixed the monthly income of deceased at Rs.8,000/-which is violative to the guidelines of the Hon’ble Supreme Court relating to notional income of an adult person. Mr. Ghosh has referred following three case laws in supp
Lakhmi Chand-vs-Reliance General Insurance
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Upahar Tragedy Victims Association and Ors
National Insurance CO. Ltd.-vs-Swaran Singh and Others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranoy Sethi And Others
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.-vs-Angad Kol & Others
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Meena Varial and Ors.
S. Iyyapan vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd & Anr. AIR 2013 SC 2262
Shamanna and Another-vs-Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Others
The court upheld the MACT's compensation award, affirming the validity of the driver's license and the appropriateness of the compensation calculation based on the deceased's income and dependents.
The court emphasized the validity of the driver's license and the reasonableness of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of liability under the Motor Vehicle Act and the Workmen Compensation Act based on driving license, permit conditions, and in....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of permit conditions under the Motor Vehicle Act and the liability of the insurance company in a motor accident case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.