Back
ROBIN PHUKAN
Imo Lollen S/o. Lt. Tai Lollen – Appellant
Versus
Horjum Lollen – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. T. T. Tara, learned counsel for the petitioners. And also heard Mr. T. Pertin, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. In this petition, filed under Section 50 of the Assam Frontier (Administration of Justice) Regulation, 1945 (here-in-after referred as ‘the AFR, 1945’), read with Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, four petitioners, namely Shri Imo Lollen and three others prayed for setting aside and quashing the judgment and order, dated 31.07.2017, passed by the learned Dy. Commissioner, Aalo, West Siang District, in connection with the Case No.WS/JK/TS-280/2017.
3. The factual background, leading to filing of the present petition, is briefly stated as under:
Not affording an opportunity to rebut claims of parties by allowing them to lead evidence either oral or documentary shall negate very foundation requirements of not only provisions but also lead to ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of a mutation must adhere to the principles of natural justice and statutory provisions, and the authority reviewing the muta....
The court ruled that the learned District Judge exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside a village authority's decision and allowing a fresh plaint, which constituted a new suit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
