KARDAK ETE
Kirri Dini Bogum S/o Late Takir Dini – Appellant
Versus
Jamar Karlo S/o Late Taja Karlo – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Ms. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Bam, learned counsel for the sole respondent.
2. By filing this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order, dated 23.03.2022, bearing No. LKB/JK/46-09/2018/75-II passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Lower Siang District, Likabali, whereby the claims of the petitioner has been rejected by upholding the various Keba decisions including the Banggo Level Keba decision dated 30.05.2018 and on the ground of delay of 12 years.
3. Leaving aside the unnecessary facts, the case of the petitioner in short is that in the year 2018, the petitioner on coming to know that the sole respondent has been claiming the ownership over the plot of land which belonged to the petitioner and his family and also the Keba decision dated 19.06.2006 and various other Kebas were held in respect of the petitioner’s land in absence of the petitioner and his family members and without the knowledge of the petitioner’s late father or any of his family member, between the sole respondent and other individuals in respect of the petitioner’s plot of land inherited from his father, the petitione
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.