SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1218

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH), AIZAWL BENCH : AIZAWL
MALASRI NANDI, J.
Union of India represented by the Assistant Commissioner, Customs Division, Aizawl, Mizoram - Appellant
Versus
Zamsawmtuanga, S/o. TinKhan Khawl and 3 Ors. - Respondents
Crl. A. 15 No.2021
Decided On : 27-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Johny L. Tochhawng.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 244, 245, 378 – Customs Act, 1962 – Section 135 – Ground of Non-prosecution – Evidence for defence –Appeal in case of acquittal – Learned counsel appearing appellant appears for respondents – Appeal has been preferred challenging judgment and order passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate Champhai, Mizoram in Criminal Complaint connection with Customs Case – Held, Court in Complaint Court considered view that even though after filing of complaint for nearly two years no progress has been taken place in case in spite of numerous notices were sent but considering fact relevant time of incident and subsequent thereto nationwide lockdown due to covid-19 pandemic – Court interest of justice case holds that order of discharge passed Criminal Complaint Case interest of justice and this Court unhesitatingly sets aside the same to prevent an aberration of justice – Criminal Appeal is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Johny L Tochhawng, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. None appears for the respondents.

2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C challenging the judgment and order dated 09.11.2020 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champhai, Mizoram in Criminal Complaint No. 17/2018 in connection with Customs Case No. 04/CL/IMP/CUS/CPF-CPI/18-19 under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, wherein the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champhai had dismissed the Criminal Complaint No. 17/2018 on the ground of non-prosecution of the case and delay of submitting final complaintsheet/charge-sheet and then discharged all the accused persons from the offence committed by them.

3. Being highly aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order as aforesaid, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal praying to set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 09.11.2020 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champhai in Criminal Complaint Case No. 17/2018 and to restore the said criminal complaint and also to allow the appellant to submit the final complaintsheet.

4. The brief facts of the case is that on 31.07.2018 at about 5.30 a.m. acting upon the reliable information, the combined team of the Customs Officers along with Assam rifles personnel proceeded towards Vaphai, Champhai district. At about 3.00 p.m., the team stopped three motor bikes of foreign origin with 5 (five) persons and conducted search thereon. The customs officers found three nos. of air compressors (old and used) under seat of each bike. The customs Officers were suspicious as the weight of an air compressor was heavier than a normal air compressor. When the air compressors were opened, the Customs Officers noticed some yellow metal biscuits believed to be gold. After proper checking, about 218 gold biscuits were recovered from the possession of the aforesaid five persons. Except gold biscuits, the Custom Officers also recovered some Indian and foreign currencies from the possession of the aforesaid five persons. On enquiry, the said five persons were identified themselves as 1. Zamsawmtuanga, 2. En Chin Thawn Dal 3. Haulammang 4. KhualLam Thang, 5. Lallianpuia and they failed to produce any valid documents for carrying those gold biscuits.

5. On failing to provide such documents, the Custom Officers informed them about illegal nature of detected goods and accordingly detained the recovered items. Thereafter, the aforesaid persons were brought to Customs office at Champhai and accordingly seizures of those recovered articles were made. One Goldsmith of Champhai was called for weighment of the seized articles and after weighment, the seized articles were found to be 36316.5 grms in total and valued at Rs. 11,18,89,612/-(Rupees Eleven Crore, Eighteen Lakhs, Eighty-Nine Thousand, Six Hundred and Twelve) only.

6. After completion of all seizure formalities, the five persons were arrested for violation of provision of the Act, punishable under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. Subsequently, those five persons were produced before the Court on 02.08.2018 except Lallianpuia who was minor at the time of the incident, the other 4(four) persons were sent to Judicial Custody. The minor Lallianpuia was sent to J.J.B. Champhai. Subsequently, on 03.08.2018 all the four accused persons were released on bail by CJM, Champhai.

7. The criminal complaint was submitted before the CJM, Champhai and the same was registered as Criminal Complaint No. 17/2018 A/o Customs Case No. 04/CL/IMP/CUS/CPF-CPI/18-19 under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. However, the complainant failed to submit complaintsheet after lapse of two years from the date of filing of the criminal complaint and as such, the case was dismissed on 09.11.2020 by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champhai, Mizoram due to non-prosecution and failure to submit chargesheet for the period of two years and then discharged the aforesaid four accused persons.

8. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cham

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top