JUDGMENT :

1. This order will dispose of both the writ petitions as well as the Interlocutory Application. The writ petitioners are the same in both the writ petitions and the I.A is filed by the respondent No. 100 in WP(C) No. 12(K)/2019 for deletion of his name from amongst the arrayed respondents.

2. Since the grievance expressed and the cause of action alleged are the same in both the writ petitions, the facts projected in WP(C) 12(K)/2019 is being referred to for brevity. Facts of the case in brief is that the petitioner No. 1 is the Nagaland NET Qualified Forum represented by its convener Sh. Luthuk Keyho while the petitioner Nos. 2 to 21 are individuals who claim that their future has been adversely affected by non-advertisement of the posts of Assistant Professors. The petitioner No. 1 is not a registered forum and claims that the name of the forum be reflected in the cause-title to avoid discontentment if the name of individual petitioner is reflected. The petitioners contend that they are Master degree holders with NET and some of them Doctorate degree holders. They are before this Court in individual capacity as their future has been adversely affected by non-advertiseme