Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT KOHIMA BENCH
YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Tangmong S/o Pachi – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of the petitioners' qualifications and appointments (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. previous legal precedents regarding contract appointments (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. argued violations of recruitment procedures and fundamental rights (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. state's justification for contract appointments amid staffing shortages (Para 16 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. court's reasoning on maintainability and locus standi of the petitioners (Para 34 , 35 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER, J.
1. The brief facts of the petitioners case is that the petitioners 1 to 14 are all qualified unemployed youth of Nagaland with Masters degree and NET qualified in their own subjects:
The petitioner 1: MA Economics/NET
Petitioner 2: MA Economics/NET
Petitioner 3: MA Political science/NET
Petitioner 4: MA Political Science/NET
Petitioner 5: M.Sc Environmental Science/NET
Petitioner 6: M.Sc Environmental Science/NET
Petitioner 7: MA History/NET
Petitioner 8: MA History/NET
Petitioner 9: M.Ed/NET
Petitioner 10: M.Ed/NET
Petitioner 11: M.Ed/NET
Petitioner 12: M.A English/NET
Petitioner 13: M.A Sociology/NET
Petitioner 14: M.A Sociology/NET.
2. It is stated that the petitioners have come before this Court challenging the a
Public appointments must adhere to transparency and fairness principles under Articles 14 and 16, and petitioners lacking qualifying status cannot challenge others' appointments legally.
Public appointments must follow transparent processes and respect established regulations; the court dismissed petitions due to lack of maintainability and proper standing.
Employers must clearly specify the nature of appointments in job advertisements; failure to do so leads to regularization of initially contractual positions when recruitment processes are followed.
Appointments to public posts must be made through a transparent process involving public advertisement to ensure equality of opportunity as mandated by the Constitution.
Appointments in public service must adhere to the order of merit as recommended by the relevant authority, and back-door entries are impermissible.
Point of law; It is clearly clarified in this judgment also in line with the earlier judgments also that unless and until the original appointment is a “regular recruitment” in accordance with “the r....
Appointments to public posts must follow a transparent recruitment process, including advertisement, to uphold constitutional rights to equality and fair opportunity.
Appointments in public service must adhere to constitutional mandates and established procedures; failure to do so renders such appointments void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
