ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, ROBIN PHUKAN
Fazar Ali, S/O. Lt. Maku Paramanik @ Maku Para – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.M. Bujor Barua, J.
Heard Mr. AR Sikder, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 being the authorities under the Union of India, Ms. A Verma, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3 being the authorities under the Home Department of the Government of Assam and Ms. M Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 being the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta.
2. Fazar Ali, S/O Mohammad of village Domoni PS Barpeta Road of Barpeta district was noticed by the Foreigners Tribunal II, Barpeta requiring him to respond in respect of Case No. 437/2015. But the notice was served on Fazar Ali, S/O Maku Paramanik of village Domoni.
3. Fazar Ali, S/O Maku Paramanik upon being served the notice entered appearance before the Tribunal, filed written statement taking a specific stand that he is Fazar Ali, S/O Maku Paramanik of village Domoni and not Fazar Ali, S/O Mohammad of village Domoni to whom the notice was actually addressed. But the Tribunal inspite of the specific stand being taken that notice was served on a person other than to whom the notice was addressed, ignored the same and continued the proceeding against Fazar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.