Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Lal Bhanu Nessa Daughter of Lt. Afaj Uddin – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition against foreigner's tribunal ruling. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner claims lack of notice. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents argue notice served. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court examines notice service issue. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. proper procedure must be followed. (Para 12) |
| 6. court upholds petitioner's right. (Para 13) |
| 7. writ petition allowed, proceedings ordered. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
(S.K. Medhi, J)
Heard Shri G. Jalan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri A.K.Dutta, learned CGC; Shri J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel, Home Department and NRC; Shri A.I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, Election Commission of India and Shri P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondent.
2. By means of this petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has put to challenge an opinion dated 06.07.2017 passed by the Foreigner’s Tribunal No. 8TH, Barpeta, Assam, in F.T. Case No. 46/2016 arising out of IM(D)T Reference Case No. 5093(A)/98. By the impugned opinion, the petitioner has been declared a foreigner post 1971.
3. Shri Jalan, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted t
Proper procedure for notice service must be strictly followed; deviations are not permissible as established by the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964.
The court reaffirmed the necessity of adhering to prescribed legal procedures for notice service, emphasizing the right to contest findings affecting citizenship.
Failure to properly serve notice under the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964 renders Tribunal opinions invalid, requiring adherence to legal service protocols.
The court ruled the necessity of proper notice in Foreigners' Tribunal proceedings to secure fair representation, deeming the order ex parte due to inadequate service.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the service of notice must be proper, and the rejection of a prayer for vacating an ex parte order should not be merely on technical grounds.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
