Back
KALYAN RAI SURANA
Principal Secretary To The Government Of Assam – Appellant
Versus
All Assam Retired Officers Teachers And Employees Committee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R. Borpujari, learned counsel for the review petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This is an application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India for review of the judgment and order dated 28.04.2016, passed by this Court in WP(C) 61/2011.
3. The respondents were the writ petitioners in the said WP(C) 61/2011. In the writ petition, the case of the respondents herein, in brief, is that the Govt. of Assam constituted Pay Commission in the year 2008, which submitted its report on 15.10.2009. The Govt. of Assam by notification dated 26.10.2009 constituted a committee to examine the report of the Assam Pay Commission, 2008. In due course, the Govt. decided to implement the recommendation of the Assam Pay Commission, 2008 w.e.f. 01.01.2006. However, by virtue of clause 42(A)(i) of the report under heading “General Decisions”, it was indicated that no arrear shall be paid to employees who retired during the period from 01.01.2006 to 31.03.2009. However, it is submitted at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that notional benefit was granted to those employee
The court upheld the government's policy decision to set a cut-off date for extending monetary benefits to retirees, affirming that such classifications are permissible under constitutional provision....
It is a well settled principle of law that statutory rules cannot be altered or amended by executive orders or circulars or instructions nor can they replace the statutory rules. The rules made under....
The statutory force of rules, impermissibility of creating two classes of pensioners, and the discriminatory nature of the classification were the central legal points established in the judgment.
Hon'ble Supreme Court held beyond shadow of any doubt that financial implication is a relevant criterion for State Government to determine as to what benefits can be granted pursuant to recommendatio....
Gratuity payments under Payment of Gratuity Act cannot be denied based on benefits from a welfare fund without proper government exemption; review petitions cannot contest previously decided matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
