Back
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, ROBIN PHUKAN
Anowara Khatun, W/o. Sahad Ali @ Sahad – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AM Bujor Barua, J
Heard Mr. J. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 being the Union of India, Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing Counsel for respondents No. 2, 4 and 5 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No.3 being the Deputy Commissioner, Goalpara.
2. The petitioner, namely, Anowara Khatun on being referred to the Foreigners’ Tribunal No.1, Goalpara for rendering an opinion as to whether she is a person who had entered in the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971, resulting in the registration of F.T. Case No.7118/G/2016.
3. On 21.04.2017, the Foreigners’ Tribunal No.1, Goalpara rendered an opinion in F.T. Case No.7118/G/2016, which was against her and being aggrieved by the said opinion, this Writ Petition was instituted by the petitioner.
4. In the Writ Proceeding, the petitioner relied upon the Voters List of 1970 of Village Hasilabil, under Goalpara Police Station in Goalpara District, which contains the name of Abdul Khaleque, Son of Sultan Miya at Sl. No.141 and claims him to be her father. To substantiate the same, the petitioner also relied
A foreigner's status must be proven by credible and verifiable evidence linking them to claimed Indian ancestors; mere appearances in voter rolls are insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of producing original school records through the Headmaster of the school to establish the information contained in the school certif....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
