IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, ROBIN PHUKAN, JJ.
Dinesh Chandra Bhowmik @ Dinesh Bhowmik @ Dinesh Chandra Baishya, S/o. Lt. Debandra Chandra Bhowmik, @ Debendra Chandra Baishya – Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India, Through The Ministry Of Home Affairs and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.3823 Of 2019
Decided On : 27-01-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Certificate purportedly - Exhibited voters list - Adjudication - Whether he is a person who entered State of subsequent to which resulted in registration of FT Case - Before Tribunal petitioner exhibited voters list of year - Held, In materials being available on record court remand matter back to Foreigners Tribunal for a fresh adjudication by taking note of voters list of village showing voters list of village showing name of petitioner as well as school certificate and subsequent voters list of village - Petitioner may also bring any further evidence from authorities of LP School by producing school records before Tribunal to establish that petitioner had attended school in year - Upon material being considered Tribunal shall pass a fresh on aforesaid issue - Writ Petition is Allowed
JUDGMENT :
(A.M. Bujor Barua, J.)
1. Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B Chakraborty, learned CGC for the respondent No. 1, Ms. A Verma, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 and 6 being the authorities in the Home Department of the Government of Assam, Mr. A Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 being the Election Commission of India, Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 being the authorities in the NRC and Ms. U. Das, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 being the Deputy Commissioner, Baksa.
2. The petitioner Dinesh Chandra Bhowmik was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal, Baksa, Tamulpur for an adjudication as to whether he is a person who entered the State of Assam subsequent to 25.03.1971 which resulted in registration of FT Case No. 672/Baksa/2016. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner exhibited the voters list of the year 1965 of village Jartaluk, PS Barama, Mauza Madhyabaksa district Kamrup, wherein at Serial No. 22, the name of Debendra Ch Bhowmik son of Sarat appears. The petitioner also exhibited the voters list of 1970 of village Jartaluk, Mauza Madhyabaksa district Kamrup, wherein at Serial No. 31, the name of Dinesh Chandar Bhowmik son of Deben appears. The petitioner also exhibited a school certificate purportedly issued by the Headmaster of 1111 No. Jartaluk LP School where the petitioner had studied.
3. The opinion dated 27.02.2019 rendered by the Foreigners Tribunal, Baksa was against the petitioner. Being aggrieved, this writ petition is instituted.
4. In the writ petition, the petitioner refers to certain subsequent voters list of the year 1790 also of village Jartaluk by way of an additional affidavit. A reading of the voters list of 1970 of village Jartaluk prima-facie indicates that the petitioner is a citizen of India provided Dinesh Chandar Bhowmik referred in the said voters list is actually the petitioner. The school certificate exhibited by the petitioner also prima-facie shows that he is the son of Debendra Chandra Bhowmik and he studied at 1111 No. Jartaluk LP School in the year 1953.
5. In view of the aforesaid materials being available on record, we remand the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal, Baksa for a fresh adjudication by taking note of the voters list of 1966 of village Jartaluk showing the name of Deben Chandra Bhowmik, the voters list of 1970 of village Jartaluk showing the name of the petitioner Dinesh Chandra Bhowmik as well as the school certificate and the subsequent voters list of village Jartaluk. The petitioner may also bring any further evidence from the authorities of the 1111 No. Jartaluk LP School by producing the school records before the Tribunal to establish that the petitioner had attended the school in the year 1953. Upon such material being considered, the Tribunal shall pass a fresh on the aforesaid issue.
6. Accordingly the earlier opinion rendered by the Foreigners Tribunal, Baksa in FT Case No. 672/Baksa/2016 is set aside and the subsequent opinion that may be rendered by the Tribunal would prevail between the parties.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the Foreigners Tribunal, Baksa, Tamulpur on 01.03.2023.
8. Send back the LCR immediately. The writ petition is allowed to the extent as indicated above.
The burden of proof rests on the claimant to provide consistent documentary evidence. When significant discrepancies exist in age, identity, and genealogical links across historical records, such evi....
The burden of proof lies on the individual to establish their citizenship under the Foreigners Act, 1946, and presenting reliable and verified evidence is crucial to prove citizenship status.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.