SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 189

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, ROBIN PHUKAN
Bharati Rabidas D/o Ramprasad Rabidas – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. S ISLAM

JUDGMENT :

A.M.Bujor Barua, J.

Heard Mr. A. Hawari, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. L. Devi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 6; Mr. T. Pegu, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 2; Ms. A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 5; and Ms. U. Das, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.

2. The petitioner, Bharati Rabidas had been referred to the Foreigners Tribunal No. 10, Dhubri for an opinion as to whether she is a person who entered the State of Assam from the specified territory after 25.03.1971 resulting in registration of FT-10/AGM/646/2017. By the order dated 18.09.2018, the Foreigners Tribunal gave an opinion that the petitioner is a foreign citizen who entered the State of Assam subsequent to 25.03.1971. Being aggrieved, this writ petition is instituted.

3. The petitioner relies upon the Voters’ List of 1966 of area no. 943 Mouza Balrampur district Kooch Behar in the State of West Bengal wherein at Serial No. 199 the name of Rabidas Ramprasad, son of Sahadeb appears. Rabidas Ramprasad, son of Sahadeb rendered evidence before the Tribunal wherein in examination in chief he stated as extracted :

“O.P. Bharti Rabidas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top